We're Making Enhancements! The IFCN Code of Principles site is temporarily unavailable due to maintenance. We will be back online soon. Thank you for your patience. For urgent inquiries, please contact us at info@ifcn.org.

Aos Fatos

Organization: Aos Fatos
Applicant: Tai Nalon
Assessor: Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos

Background

 

Aos Fatos is a widely recognized Brazilian fact-checking organization that has been active in the field for nearly a decade. The organization is an independent, for-profit with ongoing operations in Brazil since its establishment in 2015. It is formally registered as a for-profit company, specifically as a micro-enterprise operating under the name "TN Agencia de Noticias LTDA." The organization is registered in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. See link: https://cnpj.biz/22408117000141

The organization specializes in monitoring and investigating disinformation campaigns on the internet, as well as conducting fact-checks. It is acknowledged for the excellence of its verification work and its innovative technological projects.

Aos Fatos comprises more than 20 professionals and secures funding through a membership program, editorial partnerships with tech and media companies, technology projects, and grants.


Assessment Conclusion

Aos Fatos adheres to all the criteria outlined in the IFCN Code of Principles. Consequently, the recommendation to the Board is to approve the renewal of their accreditation.

on 17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago)

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos assesses application as Compliant

A short summary in native publishing language

A Aos Fatos é uma organização brasileira de verificação de fatos amplamente reconhecida, atuante no campo há quase uma década. A organização é independente e com fins lucrativos, com operações contínuas no Brasil desde sua fundação em 2015. Ela está formalmente registrada como uma empresa com fins lucrativos, mais especificamente como uma microempresa operando sob o nome "TN Agencia de Noticias LTDA." A organização está registrada no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Veja o link: https://cnpj.biz/22408117000141

A organização se especializa em monitorar e investigar campanhas de desinformação na internet, além de realizar verificações de fatos. Ela é reconhecida pela excelência de seu trabalho de verificação e seus projetos tecnológicos inovadores.

A Aos Fatos conta com mais de 20 profissionais e obtém financiamento por meio de um programa de membros, parcerias editoriais com empresas de tecnologia e mídia, projetos tecnológicos e concessões.

Section 1: Eligibility to be a signatory

To be eligible to be a signatory, applicants must meet these six criteria

  • 1.1 The applicant is a legally registered organization, or a distinct team or unit within a legally registered organization, and details of this are easily found on its website.
  • 1.2 The team, unit or organization is set up exclusively for the purpose of fact-checking.
  • 1.3 The applicant has published an average of at least one fact check a week over the course of the six months prior to the date of application. For applicants from countries with at least 5 or more verified signatories need to have at least a fact check a week over the twelve months of publishing track. Consult to factchecknet@poynter.org for confirmation.
  • 1.4 On average, at least 75% of the applicant’s fact checks focus on claims related to issues that, in the view of the IFCN, relate to or could have an impact on the welfare or well-being of individuals, the general public or society.
  • 1.5 The applicant’s editorial output is not, in the view of the IFCN, controlled by the state, a political party or politician.
  • 1.6 If the organization receives funding from local or foreign state or political sources, it provides a statement on its site setting out to the satisfaction of the IFCN, how it ensures its funders do not influence the findings of its reports.

Criteria 1.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please explain where on your website you set out information about your organization’s legal status and how this complies with criteria. Attach a link to the relevant page of your website.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago)
Aos Fatos is a journalistic company trading name. It is registered under the CNPJ 22.408.117/0001-41 as news agency. Reference: https://www.aosfatos.org/termos-de-uso/
Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago)

Aos Fatos is a widely recognized Brazilian fact-checking organization that has been active in the field for nearly a decade. It is formally registered as a for-profit company, specifically as a micro-enterprise operating under the name "Tn Agencia de Noticias LTDA." The organization is registered in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. See link: https://cnpj.biz/22408117000141


done_all 1.1 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 1.2
Proof you meet criteria
Please answer the following questions – (see notes in Guidelines for Application on how to answer)

 1. When and why was your fact-checking operation started?
 2. How many people work or volunteer in the organization and what are their roles?
 3. What different activities does your organization carry out?
 4. What are the goals of your fact-checking operation over the coming year?

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago

Aos Fatos is a Brazilian award-winning journalistic organization launched in July 2015. Aos Fatos has grown to be one of the most innovative outlets in Latin American journalism. Its tech-savvy team of 20+ multidisciplinary professionals (https://www.aosfatos.org/nossa-equipe/) adds automation solutions to a creative approach. Within the team, there are journalists, data scientists, developers, and product-thinking specialists.

The combination of journalism, social media engagement, technology and design results in groundbreaking tools to tackle misinformation, such as an algorithm that automatically monitors disinformation campaigns, conversational and monitoring bots, AI-assisted tools and new audiovisual formats.

The team also conducts state-of-the-art investigative work against disinformation campaigns that challenge Brazil's democratic institutions. Aos Fatos also builds automation solutions in order to improve our work, such as Escriba, a very accurate transcription tool, and Fátima, our famous chatbot for Telegram and WhatsApp. Recently, Aos Fatos applied LLMs to its chatbots, creating a potentially revolutionary tool for combatting disinformation. 

In 2024, Aos Fatos aims to cover Brazil's local elections, as well as expand generative AI models to our productivity and monitoring tools.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago)

Aos Fatos is an award-winning journalistic organization based in Brazil, launched in July 2015. Over this almost a decade, the fact-checking organizations has evolved into one of the most technological innovative outlets in Latin American journalism. The outlet boasts a tech-savvy approach by relying on more than 20 multidisciplinary professionals, as shown on their team page (https://www.aosfatos.org/nossa-equipe/). This diverse team includes journalists, data scientists, linguists, developers, and specialists in product thinking, combining automation solutions with a creative approach to their work.

Consequently, the organization has become a pioneer in the utilization of emerging technologies, including LLM. This year, Aos Fatos introduced its renowned bot, Fátima, which has been deployed across various platforms. Leveraging LLM, the new bot Fátima aims to play a crucial role in combating mis- and disinformation in the country by providing a tool for more friendly conversations.

According to the team, the goal is continue to invest in AI tools to assist their productivity and quality of work aiming the Brazilian local elections in 2024.


done_all 1.2 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 1.3
Proof you meet criteria
- The applicant has published an average of at least one fact check a week over the course of the six months prior to the date of application.
- For applicants from countries with at least 5 or more verified signatories need to have at least a fact check a week over the twelve months of publishing track.
- Consult to factchecknet@poynter.org for confirmation.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago)

All of Aos Fatos' fact-checks can be seen in one place: https://aosfatos.org/noticias/

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago)

Aos Fatos has provided a link to its fact-checks, showcasing a consistent track record of publishing more than one article per week over the course of twelve months. Therefore, the applicant exceeds the minimum requirement of publishing at least one fact-check per week.


done_all 1.3 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 1.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous three months. No additional information required.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago)

Aos Fatos never received funding from governments nor from politicians or political parties in Brazil or elsewhere.

Aos Fatos collaborates with the Superior Tribunal Eleitoral from Brazil and public TVs such as TV Cultura from São Paulo. They republish Aos Fatos' content for free.

You can see more information about Aos Fatos' projects here:

https://www.aosfatos.org/aos-fatos-lab/

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago)

Aos Fatos conducts fact-checks that cover a broad range of subjects, including politics, health, the economy, and societal issues. These fact-checks are relevant to current news events, not only within Brazil but also extending to the United States, Latin America, and globally. Additionally, as stated by the applicant, Aos Fatos collaborates with Brazil's Superior Tribunal Eleitoral and public service television channels such as TV Cultura from São Paulo to freely republish their content.


done_all 1.4 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 1.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please explain any commercial, financial and/or institutional relationship your organization has to the state, politicians or political parties in the country or countries you cover. Also explain funding or support received from foreign as well as local state or political actors over the previous financial year.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago)

It doesn't.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago)

According to the applicant, the organization has no commercial, financial, or institutional relationships with the state, politicians, or political parties. No evidence was found.


done_all 1.5 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 1.6
Proof you meet criteria
If you confirmed the organization receives funding from local or foreign state or political sources, provide a link to where on your website you set out how you ensure the editorial independence of your work.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago)

It doesn't.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago)

The applicant has never received funding from governments, politicians, or political parties in Brazil or elsewhere. However, it is important to highlight that Aos Fatos has editorial partnerships with Meta, Telegram, and Kwai to fact-check viral content on these platforms. Additionally, the organization has a collaboration with the news portal Terra to republish its content. Aos Fatos has also received foreign grants, potentially from platforms like Meta and Google, as well as philanthropic institutions like IFCJ, to support the development of some of their innovative projects. It is recommended that the organization includes details about these collaborations and grants on their About page for enhanced transparency (https://www.aosfatos.org/quem-somos/).


done_all 1.6 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Section 2: A commitment to Non-partisanship and Fairness

To be compliant on nonpartisanship and fairness, applicants must meet these five criteria

  • 2.1 The applicant fact-checks using the same high standards of evidence and judgement for equivalent claims regardless of who made the claim.
  • 2.2 The applicant does not unduly concentrate its fact-checking on any one side, considers the reach and importance of claims it selects to check and publishes a short statement on its website to set out how it selects claims to check.
  • 2.3 The applicant discloses in its fact checks relevant interests of the sources it quotes where the reader might reasonably conclude those interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided. It also discloses in its fact checks any commercial or other such relationships it has that a member of the public might reasonably conclude could influence the findings of the fact check.
  • 2.4 The applicant is not as an organization affiliated with nor declares or shows support for any party, any politician or political candidate, nor does it advocate for or against any policy positions on any issues save for transparency and accuracy in public debate.
  • 2.5 The applicant sets out its policy on non-partisanship for staff on its site. Save for the issues of accuracy and transparency, the applicant’s staff do not get involved in advocacy or publicise their views on policy issues the organization might fact check in such a way as might lead a reasonable member of the public to see the organization’s work as biased.

Criteria 2.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please share links to 10 fact checks published over the past year that you believe demonstrate your non-partisanship.
Please briefly explain how the fact checks selected show that (I) you use the same high standards of evidence for equivalent claims, (II) follow the same essential process for every fact check and (III) let the evidence dictate your conclusions.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Each link listed here has a different main character and complies with our policy of fact-checking as many different topics and politicians as possible, without leading to false equivalences and a biased coverage.


1. Hamas-Israel war: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/cenas-videogame-nao-ataque-israel-hamas/

2. Argentinian candidate Sergio Massa: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/falso-video-sergio-massa-cocaina/

3. Lula + anti-LGBTQ agenda: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/falso-banheiros-unissex-escolas/

4. Marina Silva, Brazil's environment minister: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/bolsa-marina-silva-visita-rio-grande-do-sul/

5. Rui Costa, Brazil's domestic affairs minister: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/rui-costa-letalidade-policial-bahia/

6. Pope Francis + climate changes: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/falso-papa-francisco-sacrificar-alcoolatras/

7. Supreme Court justice + election fraud: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/video-nunes-marques-urnas-fraudadas-voto-fora-de-contexto/

8. Lula: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/lula-falseia-dados-divida-paises-africanos/

9. Vaccines: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/oms-nao-disse-que-vacinas-nao-sao-necessarias/

10. Digital fraud: https://www.aosfatos.org/noticias/posts-inventam-leilao-de-smartphones-pelos-correios-para-aplicar-golpe/

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

As requested, Aos Fatos has effectively demonstrated its non-partisanship by providing ten instances of fact-checks conducted on political leaders and parties across the entire political spectrum in Brazil and beyond.

The evidence gathered for this assessment suggests that Aos Fatos extends its coverage beyond political parties, addressing public concerns such as vaccines, war, and digital fraud, as well as scrutinizing other power institutions like the Supreme Court of Justice. The organization consistently maintains high evidentiary standards when evaluating claims from various ideological backgrounds.

Moreover, it is evident that Aos Fatos strives to utilize a diverse range of sources to verify claims, allowing the available evidence to dictate their conclusions. According to its approach, the organizations exclusively fact-checks content that has achieved virality, holds significant visibility, or has the potential to cause harm.


done_all 2.1 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 2.2
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to a place on your website where you explain how you select claims to check, explaining how you ensure you do not unduly concentrate your fact-checking on any one side, and how you consider the reach and importance of the claims you select to check.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

According to the information available on Aos Fatos's website, the organization adheres to consistent standards of verification for all rumors, with conclusions guided by the evidence. The team fact-checks statements from authorities and influencers, as well as rumors, photographs, videos, audio recordings, graphics, pamphlets, drawings, and other forms of media.

Before publication on the Aos Fatos website, any of these materials undergo a thorough review by at least two editors: one collaborates with the reporter to verify the consulted sources, while the second conducts the final revision, confirming the method's coherence.

The given instruction available at Aos Fatos's website is that journalists need to investigate, analyze, explain, and fact-check topics that are relevant to their audience and have a tangible impact on the lives of Brazilians. The sources used for these endeavors are required to be listed at the end of every published article on the website, accompanied by links, which are seem in their fact-checks.


done_all 2.2 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 2.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous year. No additional information required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

Following a random review of fact-checks published since January 2023, no evidence of any commercial interests that could potentially influence the fact-checking activities of the applicant was found. The initiative appears to maintain journalistic neutrality by consistently disclosing relevant interests associated with the sources referenced in its fact-checks. This transparency allows readers to reasonably assess whether these interests might impact the accuracy of the evidence presented.


done_all 2.3 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 2.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous year. No additional information required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

After conducting a random review of fact-checks published since January 2023, no affiliations with any political party, politicians, or political candidates were identified. Furthermore, there is no apparent advocacy in favor of or against specific policy positions found within the fact-checks. The fact-checks cover a broad political spectrum, including viewpoints from the extremes, encompassing both far-right and far-left perspectives.


done_all 2.4 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 2.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to a place on your website where you publish a statement setting out your policy on non-partisanship for staff and how it ensures the organization meets this criteria.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

As per your request, Aos Fatos has a statement of non-partisanship in the provided link: "[A]ll journalists comprising the Aos Fatos team are subject to public scrutiny, expressly instructed not to endorse any form of political partisanship, either formally or informally. The team refrains from engaging in activism or expressing preferences, actively encouraged to listen to all perspectives. Any behavior conflicting with the pursuit of impartiality and diversity is not in line with Aos Fatos' philosophy or editorial stance." ([T]odos os jornalistas que integram a equipe do Aos Fatos estão sob escrutínio público, de modo que são expressamente orientados a não endossar formal ou informalmente qualquer discurso político-partidário. A equipe não faz militância nem manifesta preferência — ela é estimulada a ouvir todos os lados. Qualquer comportamento destoante da busca pela isenção e da pluralidade não faz parte da filosofia do Aos Fatos, tampouco de sua linha editorial).


done_all 2.5 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Section 3: A commitment to Standards and Transparency of Sources

To be compliant on sources, applicants must meet these four criteria

  • 3.1 The applicant identifies the source of all significant evidence used in their fact checks, providing relevant links where the source is available online, in such a way that users can replicate their work if they wish. In cases where identifying the source would compromise the source’s personal security, the applicant provides as much detail as compatible with the source’s safety.
  • 3.2 The applicant uses the best available primary, not secondary, sources of evidence wherever suitable primary sources are available. Where suitable primary sources are not available, the applicant explains the use of a secondary source.
  • 3.3 The applicant checks all key elements of claims against more than one named source of evidence save where the one source is the only source relevant on the topic.
  • 3.4 The applicant identifies in its fact checks the relevant interests of the sources it uses where the reader might reasonably conclude those interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided.

Criteria 3.1
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

By analyzing a randomized sample, I can verify that Aos Fatos extensively includes links to substantiate its fact-checks. These references empower users to independently verify the pertinent information provided by this fact-checking initiative.


done_all 3.1 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 3.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

By analyzing a randomized sample, it becomes clear that Aos Fatos consistently supports its fact-checks with a diverse and relevant range of sources. When applicable, primary sources such as government entities and open data sources from official bodies are utilized. Furthermore, these reports reference secondary sources, mainly comprising news articles from well-established and reputable media outlets. These sources play a complementary role, either reinforcing the fact-checking conclusions or providing readers with additional context.


done_all 3.2 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 3.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

After conducting a random review of various fact-checks published in the past year, the overall evaluation for this criterion is positive. The applicant consistently verifies all essential aspects of claims by cross-referencing them with multiple identifiable sources of evidence, unless there is a situation where a single source is the sole relevant one on the subject.


done_all 3.3 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 3.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

Aos Fatos consistently discloses and provides context for the sources used, allowing readers to evaluate any relevant interests that might influence the fact-check. These sources are publicly accessible, and their significance in the verifications is apparent. Thus, the applicant demonstrates transparency and responsibility regarding the sources used, ensuring that they are identified along with any potential interests that could impact the conclusion of a fact-check.


done_all 3.4 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Section 4: A commitment to Transparency of Funding & Organization

To be compliant on funding and organization, applicants must meet these five criteria

  • 4.1 Applicants that are independent organizations have a page on their website detailing each source of funding accounting for 5% or more of total revenue for its previous financial year. This page also sets out the legal form in which the organization is registered (e.g. as a non-profit, as a company etc).
  • 4.2 Applicants that are the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization make a statement on ownership.
  • 4.3 A statement on the applicant’s website sets out the applicant’s organizational structure and makes clear how and by whom editorial control is exercised.
  • 4.4 A page on the applicant’s website details the professional biography of all those who, according to the organizational structure and play a significant part in its editorial output.
  • 4.5 The applicant provides easy means on its website and/or via social media for users to communicate with the editorial team.

Criteria 4.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please confirm whether you are an ‘independent organization’
or ‘the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization’ and share proof of this organizational status.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago

Aos Fatos is a journalistic company trading name. It is registered as a news agency: https://www.aosfatos.org/termos-de-uso/

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

The applicant is identified as an independent for-profit organization, and this information is explicitly outlined on the website (registered name "TAINA NALON XAVIER AGENCIA DE NOTICIAIS", under the number 22.408.117/0001-41". In the "Termos de Uso" (Terms of Use) page, the organization details various funding sources. Among these, editorial partnerships with Meta, Telegram, and Kwai are established for fact-checking viral content on these platforms. Furthermore, Aos Fatos collaborates with the news portal Terra for the republication of its content. The organization has also received foreign grants, potentially from platforms like Meta and Google, as well as philanthropic institutions like IFCJ, to support the development of innovative projects. As previously mentioned, it is recommended that the organization includes details about these collaborations and grants on the website to enhance transparency.


done_all 4.1 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 4.2
Proof you meet criteria
If your organization is an “independent organization”, please share a link to the page on your website where you detail your funding and indicate the legal form in which the organization is registered (e.g. as a non-profit, as a company etc).
If your organization is “the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization”, please share a link to the statement on your website about your ownership.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

According to the provided link, Aos Fatos operates on a business strategy draw on three fronts: journalistic production, intelligence, and technology. Supporting this model is possible through a set of projects, products, and services that ensure financial sustainability for the company. These include:

- The Aos Fatos Mais supporters program (membership program);

- Editorial partnerships (as mentioned before, with platforms and Terra);

- Technology and intelligence products and services from Aos Fatos Lab, such as the Aos Fatos Radar and Escriba (generate revenue from subscription fees or services).

The organization has also received foreign grants, potentially being part of their revenue streams. As previously mentioned, it is recommended that the organization includes details about these collaborations and grants on the website to enhance transparency.


done_all 4.2 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 4.3
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you set out your organizational structure, making clear how and by whom editorial control is exercised.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

The link provided by the applicant outlines the organizational structure of the unit, providing a clear understanding of the editorial team members and their respective operational roles.


done_all 4.3 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 4.4
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you set out the professional biographies of those who play a significant part in your organization’s editorial output.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago

We do not disclose our team's biographies anymore due to online safety: https://www.aosfatos.org/nossa-equipe/

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

The applicant presents names and positions on the Our Team (Nossa equipe) page but does not provide professional bios. According to them, this precaution measure adopted to safety concerns arising from frequent attacks. As this has been a common point in previous applications, this is criterion is in complicance.


done_all 4.4 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 4.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you encourage users to communicate with your editorial team.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago

There are different instances:

1. WhatsApp and Telegram's chatbot: https://www.aosfatos.org/fatima/

2. Homepage: https://www.aosfatos.org/

3. Newsletters: https://mailchi.mp/aosfatos/aosfatos-form-190723

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

Based on the provided links, Aos Fatos offers convenient channels for audience communication, notably through Fatima, their WhatsApp, Telegram, and Messenger chatbots. On their website, a small button at the bottom of the page allows users to contact them via email (ouvidoria@aosfatos.org). However, I couldn't identify specific ways to directly communicate with the editorial team through the provided links.


done_all 4.5 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Section 5: A commitment to Standards and Transparency of Methodology

To be compliant on methodology, applicants must meet these six criteria

  • 5.1 The applicant publishes on its website a statement about the methodology it uses to select, research, write and publish its fact checks.
  • 5.2 The applicant selects claims to check based primarily on the reach and importance of the claims, and where possible explains the reason for choosing the claim to check.
  • 5.3 The applicant sets out in its fact checks relevant evidence that appears to support the claim as well as relevant evidence that appears to undermine it.
  • 5.4 The applicant in its fact checks assesses the merits of the evidence found using the same high standards applied to evidence on equivalent claims, regardless of who made the claim.
  • 5.5 The applicant seeks where possible to contact those who made the claim to seek supporting evidence, noting that (I) this is often not possible with online claims, (II) if the person who makes the claim fails to reply in a timely way this should not impede the fact check, (III) if a speaker adds caveats to the claim, the fact-checker should be free to continue with checking the original claim, (IV) fact-checkers may not wish to contact the person who made the claim for safety or other legitimate reasons.
  • 5.6 The applicant encourages users to send in claims to check, while making it clear what readers can legitimately expect will be fact-checked and what isn’t fact-checkable.

Criteria 5.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a link to the statement on your website that explains the methodology you use to select, research, write and publish your fact checks.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

Aos Fatos's methodology is accessible through the provided link. On this page, the team outlines the types of content they fact-check. According to the information provided, the team adheres to consistent verification standards for all false or misleading content, allowing the evidence to guide their conclusions. Aos Fatos' journalists fact-check statements from authorities and influencers, as well as rumors, photos, videos, audio clips, graphics, pamphlets, drawings, and other media forms. This approach is adopted to ensure their audience verifies the authenticity of the content consumed on the internet and the accuracy of statements made by elected representatives. They prioritize fact-checking rumors with the potential to cause harm to groups and individuals based on their level of virality.


done_all 5.1 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 5.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

After conducting a random review of several fact-checks published by Aos Fatos, no instances of infringement have been identified. This suggests that the initiative aligns with this criterion by addressing matters of social significance and reach.


done_all 5.2 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 5.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

Based on a random sample, it is evident that Aos Fatos presents claims and arguments in a responsible manner. They provide relevant evidence both in favor of and against the claims in their fact-checks. There is no indication of varying fact-checking standards based on the source of the claim or the subject under scrutiny. The initiative appears to consistently apply the same fact-checking standards, irrespective of whether the claims are true, false or in between.


done_all 5.3 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 5.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

In the majority of randomly analyzed fact-checking reports, the authorship of the fact-checked statement is mentioned. In some cases, the reports include a statement made by the author of the claim, while in others, there is information indicating that the author could not be identified or did not respond to the questions from Aos Fatos' journalists. Additionally, some articles debunk misleading or false content without focusing on a specific author, targeting diverse pages and profiles instead.


done_all 5.4 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 5.5
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

Based on the random sample, no issues have been identified. The initiative consistently makes efforts to contact individuals who have made claims for clarification. However, it is acknowledged that in cases involving viral social media posts, this may not always be possible.


done_all 5.5 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 5.6
Proof you meet criteria
Please describe how you encourage users to send in claims to check, while making it clear what readers can legitimately expect will be fact-checked and what isn’t fact-checkable. Include links where appropriate. If you do not allow this, explain why.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago

Aos Fatos uses WhatsApp and Telegram's chatbot Fátima (https://www.aosfatos.org/fatima/) as the center of our audience strategy. With over 35,000 users, managing such interactions with automation is the only way possible. Fátima provides on-demand fact-checks based on linguistic patterns and beta tests LLMs (long language models). All unsuccessful interactions are sent to a database for crowdsourcing brand-new disinformation patterns.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

Aos Fatos relies on gathering claims sent by users via its chatbots, namely Fatima on WhatsApp and Telegram applications. These bots boast over 35,000 users and provide on-demand fact-checks based on linguistic patterns and beta tests with LLMs, according to the applicant. If a claim is not immediately found, it is added to a database for later verification. The chatbot is extensively promoted, and readers are actively encouraged to interact with it.


done_all 5.6 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Section 6: A commitment to an Open & Honest Corrections Policy

To be compliant on corrections policy, applicants must meet these five criteria

  • 6.1 The applicant has a corrections or complaints policy that is easily visible and accessible on the organization’s website or frequently referenced in broadcasts.
  • 6.2 The policy sets out clear definitions of what it does and does not cover, how major mistakes, especially those requiring revised conclusions of a fact check, are handled, and the fact that some complaints may justify no response. This policy is adhered to scrupulously.
  • 6.3 Where credible evidence is provided that the applicant has made a mistake worthy of correction, the applicant makes a correction openly and transparently, seeking as far as possible to ensure that users of the original see the correction and the corrected version.
  • 6.4 The applicant, if an existing signatory, should either on its corrections/complaints page or on the page where it declares itself an IFCN signatory inform users that if they believe the signatory is violating the IFCN Code, they may inform the IFCN, with a link to the IFCN site.
  • 6.5 If the applicant is the fact-checking unit of a media company, it is a requirement of signatory status that the parent media company has and adheres to an open and honest corrections policy.

Criteria 6.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a link to where you publish on your website your corrections or complaints policy. If you are primarily a broadcaster, please provide evidence you frequently reference your corrections policy in broadcasts.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

The applicant has a well-defined correction policy in place. Users can report errors by sending an email to ouvidoria@aosfatos.org. This information is accessible through the "Errors Policy" (Política de erros) page.


done_all 6.1 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 6.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the corrections policy to verify it meets critera. No additional information needed.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago


Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

The Aos Fatos team commits on their website to analyze all requests for corrections they receive. Upon confirming an error, the team proceeds to make the necessary changes on the page of the fact-checking story. If the correction substantially alters the originally given title of the article, Aos Fatos also commits to publicizing the corrected version on social media with a new title and the notice "CORREÇÃO" (CORRECTION). If the title of the material contains errors, the correction notice will also be incorporated into it.


done_all 6.2 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 6.3
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a short statement about how the policy was adhered to over the previous year (or six months if this is the first application) including evidence of two examples of the responses provided by the applicant to a correction request over the previous year. Where no correction request has been made in the previous year, you must state this in your application, which will be publicly available in the assessment if your application is successful.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago

Our correction policy is here, with details on how to proceed in case of mistakes made by our team: https://aosfatos.org/politica-de-erros/

We haven't received a correction request that was actually necessary in 2023. It's the first time it has happened though.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

The applicant has not issued any corrections in 2023. According to the Aos Fatos team, this marks the first occurrence of such an event. When Aos Fatos makes an error, they rectify the information transparently: any report containing any degree of inaccuracy undergoes reevaluation, and once the error is confirmed, it is promptly corrected. In these cases, at the bottom of the article, there will always be an editor's note, specifying the day and time of the correction and detailing the information that was altered. The passage of the text in question will also indicate that its content has been modified.


done_all 6.3 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 6.4
Proof you meet criteria
If you are an existing signatory, please provide a link to show where on your site you inform users that if they believe you are violating the IFCN Code, they may inform the IFCN of this, with a link to the complaints page on the IFCN site.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

In the provided link, there is the following statement: "If you believe that Aos Fatos does not adhere to the guidelines of the International Fact-Checking Network, which ensures compliance with parameters of transparency regarding errors, sources, and funding, as well as non-partisanship and impartiality, please submit a complaint here" (Caso você acredite que Aos Fatos não está de acordo com as diretrizes da International Fact-Checking Network, que assegura o cumprimento de parâmetros de transparência de erros, fontes e financiamento, além de apartidarismo e isenção, envie uma reclamação aqui).


done_all 6.4 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.

Criteria 6.5
Proof you meet criteria
If you are the fact-checking unit of a media company, please provide a link to the parent media company’s honest and open corrections policy and provide evidence that it adheres to this.

Aos Fatos
14-Nov-2023 (10 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago

Not applicable.

Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos Assessor
17-Jan-2024 (8 months ago) Updated: 8 months ago

Not applicable; the applicant is an independent organization.


done_all 6.5 marked as Compliant by Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos.