The About Us section of the program website (see: https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb) mentions that FactCheck Georgia is a program of Georgia’s Reforms Associates (GRASS), a non-partisan, non-governmental policy watchdog and think tank (https://grass.org.ge/en). GRASS is legally registered at the National Agency of Public Registry. Please find the registration document attached below.

The About Us section on the GRASS's website outlines the mission of the organization and mentions the date it was established (https://grass.org.ge/en/grass-is-gundi). In addition, the information about the founders of the organization (see: https://grass.org.ge/en/grass-is-gundi/damphudzneblebi), as well as about the board members (https://grass.org.ge/en/grass-is-gundi/board) are accessible for the public. 

FactCheck Georgia is the special project of Georgia's Reforms Associates (GRASS), non-government and non-profit organisation legally registered in Georgia that is confirmed by the copy of Registration Certificate that was added to the application. This information is published on https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb 

Established in 2013, FactCheck Georgia (https://factcheck.ge/en) is a program piloted and implemented by Georgia’s Reforms Associates (GRASS). Program staff includes up to twenty-five people, out of which fifteen represent fact-check experts specializing in different fields, such as journalism, economics, law and judiciary, international relations, public policy and good governance, education, propaganda, disinformation, etc. The rest of the staff members include managerial and administrative personnel, such as the program director, program coordinator, program assistant, financial manager, social media manager, and so on.

In September 2020, FactCheck Georgia established a partnership with Facebook, Since September 2020, FactCheck Georgia has been a partner to Meta’s (Facebook) third-party fact-checking program. Within the program, FactCheck Georgia reviews the veracity of the content spread on Meta’s platforms. FactCheck Georgia’s work within the program is guided by the principles of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) and Meta's Fact-Checking Program policy. This partnership has made it possible for FactCheck to outreach those information ecosystems on Facebook, where disinformation is most prevalent. We regularly offer internship opportunities to young people in Georgia, together with training them and involving in relevant program activities.

FactCheck’s main objectives are to (1) provide precise, accurate, and evidence-based information to readers; (2) increase the accountability and responsibility of politicians to their constituencies; (3) promote the development of fact-based political rhetoric; (4) fight against fake news and online hoaxes by providing verified facts to our readers. To this end, FactCheck’s team monitors political statements and highlights the factual accuracies and inaccuracies, respectively. In terms of fighting against dis/misinformation and online hoaxes, FactCheck team monitors Facebook as well as different online media outlets on a daily basis.

Over the coming year, FactCheck will continue to conduct its regular work, which includes fact-checking parliamentary sessions, political talk-shows, and the statements of the government's team and opposition political forces. In addition, the program will work towards increasing awareness of the local population in political processes before the upcoming 2024 parliamentary elections. We will provide the public with up-to-date information on actual public policy issues covering not only statements of politicians but also analyzing the most significant political decisions, economic, social, healthcare, and legal issues and cases, legislative initiatives, party programs, and activities, etc.

Furthermore, debunking fake news and online hoaxes will remain to be another central dimension of the program. To this end, we will continue to monitor relevant social and traditional media platforms, as well as individual accounts to expose their malign activities and diminish the penetration of manipulative information in the Georgian public. In this sense, the following topics will be a priority for the FactCheck Georgia's debunking team: the war in Ukraine, health-related misinformation (Covid-19 and Monkeypox - which are largely used by disinformation sources to mislead the public in Georgia), as well as domestic political developments that often become a subject of manipulation by different actors in Georgia both on traditional and new media channels.

FactCheck will also continue to engage fact-checkers in ethnic minority-populated regions of Samtskhe-Javakheti and Kvemo Kartli as well as two other regions, such as Adjara and Gori, to analyze the issues of local importance. As our work demonstrated for the past two years, local communities in these regions are very responsive to our findings, and sustaining these efforts will contribute to further improving our level of outreach and engagement as well as increased resilience towards disinformation.

In terms of content, we will complement our investigative and analytical journalism with multimedia storytelling to widen audience and contribute to equipping the Georgian population with proper knowledge and skills to consume information. Besides written articles, we will apply user-friendly and creative forms of reporting, such as video clips, data visuals, infographics, and posters, as well as introduce a new component – FactCheck Podcasts, which will serve to diversify our content even more and build a better connection with our audience. Our articles will be published in Georgian, Armenian, Azerbaijani, and Russian languages, with some selected materials also translated into English for foreign audiences. In addition, the partnership will be strengthened or established with relevant nationwide and regional media outlets to share or refer to the program content for wider dissemination. 

As it stated on the website FactCheck Georgia initially was set up for exclusively fact-checking purposes and until now is performing this mission publishing fact-check pieces in five languages. FactCheck Georgia is regional partner of Meta (Facebook) third-party fact-checking program.

Since 2013, FactCheck Georgia published over four thousand articles. All articles can be accessed through this link – Georgian: https://factcheck.ge/ka/stories/archive; English: https://factcheck.ge/en/stories/archive. 

All articles have a publication date indicated. As you can see on the web page, at least one article is published in Georgian language per day over the past year. Some articles are published in English, Russian, Azerbaijani, and Armenian languages. 

Tracking of the publications feed had proven that within last six months FactCheck Georgia had published daily factchecking publications in Georgian language. Several stories per week were published at the English language stories feed. Also FactCheck Georgia is publishing every month several publications in Armenian, Azeri, and Russian languages. 

Analysis of previous three month publications topics on the website showed that FactCheck Georgia is focusing on socially important issues including politics, economy, and other topics arranged in convenient way (geographically, by names and by topics) that have a direct impact on public welfare. 

FactCheck Georgia does not have any kind of commercial, financial, and/or institutional relationship with the state, politicians, or political parties. As the methodology document of the program points out, FactCheck Georgia is politically independent and nonpartisan (see: https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია). Its nonpartisanship is proved by the articles published on the program website and the verdicts, which are based on an objective analysis of information.

According to the guideline document for FactCheck analysts (please see attached), program team members are obliged to leave their political preferences behind and maintain absolute nonpartisanship during fact-checking. In addition, biographies of FactCheck team members are transparent and published on the program website (see: https://factcheck.ge/ka/chven-shesaxeb/team), demonstrating that they are not affiliated with political parties. 

As for the organization, GRASS is non-partisan, and with its activities, it only aims to benefit the public interests. GRASS as a whole and FactCheck Georgia, in particular, do not advocate for any political party or candidate. Nonpartisanship is one of the major requirements applied to job candidates during the selection process. In addition, if any member of the organization decides to join or advocate for any political organization, it automatically results in the termination of the labor agreement, and he/she is dismissed from GRASS.

Based on the content analysis and editorial policy and statement it is evident that FactCheck Georgia does't have any relations with local state ad political actors, does not support any political party or candidate.

FactCheck has never received funding from local state actors. As for foreign donors, in the past FactCheck was funded by US Embassy in Georgia and Dutch Embassy in Georgia. This information is accessible both on the project website (https://factcheck.ge/en/პროექტის-მხარდამჭერები) and organization website (http://grass.org.ge/en/projects/). Funding from respectful foreign embassies prove once again that FactCheck Georgia is committed to highest journalistic standards. Editorial independence of the project is set out in the methodology (https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია) and internal guideline documents. 

The support provided by the Embassy of Netherlands, US Embassy and USAID does not affect editorial policy and it is clearly stated that: "The views and opinions expressed on this website belong to FactCheck.ge and are not the views and opinions of project support organisations".

There is a detailed description of how FactCheck Georgia is setting up editorial independence and impartiality here https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია . 

1. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/40127--saakashvili-takes-purees-and-natural-juices-this-is-food-this-is-no-longer-a-medical-prescription-this-is-food-which-the-prisoner-takes - Rati Bregadze, minister of justice, verdict – Lie.

2. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/40049--investments-in-tbilisi-decreased-fivefold-in-the-last-four-years - Ana Bibilashvili, political movement – Lelo, verdict – Half True

3. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/40374--there-were-107-million-bottles-of-wine-exported-from-georgia-to-62-countries-in-2021-which-is-a-historic-maximum - Irakli Gharibashvili, prime minister, verdict – True

4. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/41002--according-to-the-imf-s-preliminary-estimates-georgia-is-ranked-third-in-the-world-and-first-on-the-eurasian-continent-in-terms-of-the-gdp-growth-rate-in-usd-the-gdp-will-double-in-the-next-six-years-and-exceed-usd-9-000 - Irakli Gharibashvili, prime minister, verdict – Manipulation

5. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/40420--bureaucracy-salaries-mayors-chairs-of-municipality-councils-etc-have-increased-by-gel-194-million - Mikheil Saakashvili, leader of the United National Movement party, verdict – Mostly True

6. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/40699-according-to-the-first-two-months-data-there-is-a-substantial-growth-as-total-growth-figure-of-january-and-february-reached-16-3-naturally-it-has-its-own-reasons-in-addition-to-base-effect-there-is-a-large-growth-in-regard-to-export - Lasha Khutsishvili, minister of finance, verdict – Half True

7. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/40662--the-government-has-indeed-spared-no-effort-for-the-vaccination-process - Zurab Azarashvili, minister of health, verdict – Lie

8. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/40822-the-unemployment-rate-in-georgia-is-at-a-historic-high - Ana Natsvlishvili, political movement – Lelo, verdict – Lie

9. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/41071--this-year-for-the-first-time-in-the-history-of-the-independent-georgia-moldova-is-ahead-of-us-in-terms-of-the-gdp-per-capita - Giorgi Vashadze, political party – Strategy Aghmashenebeli, verdict – mostly false

10. https://factcheck.ge/en/story/41031--in-2021-russia-was-the-third-largest-petroleum-product-exporter-to-georgia-whilst-russia-has-become-the-largest-oil-exporter-for-georgia-during-the-war - Elene Khoshtaria, political party – Droa, verdict – Mostly True 

These examples demonstrate that FactCheck Georgia is committed to nonpartisanship and fairness. Specifically, no matter fact-check is applied to the representatives of the government or opposition parties, verdicts are issued in compliance with the accuracy of their statements. Archive materials published on the program web page prove that FactCheck Georgia responds directly to the importance of adhering to the principles of defendable fact-based research, journalistic integrity on the highest of professional levels, unbiased and fairness in reporting, and the accountability and transparency of sources.

Fact-checkers work according to an internal FactCheck Guideline document developed in 2013. The document has been subject to several updates and improvements and to a large degree, corresponded to the FactChecker’s Code of Principles before it was established. FactCheck Guideline contributes to maintaining coherent standards by establishing a set of rules for fact-checkers concerning the structure of articles, writing style, duties, terms, timelines, and procedures, etc. (please see attached).

Naturally, FactCheck recognizes the possibility that mistakes can occur in the process of writing and finalizing the articles. Therefore, should politicians or public figures disagree with our assessment of their statements (or any of our readers as well), FactCheck encourages them to provide us with a relevant argument. Received proofs are closely examined by the FactCheck board and in the event of their validity, we revise or amend our research as well as the verdict accordingly.

The fact-checks provided in the links shows that Factcheck Georgia is using the same standards and professional approach in fact-checking.

FactCheck Georgia's web page publishes a thorough methodology (https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია) detailing FactCheck’s working principles, which complements with the code of principles elaborated by International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). The methodology explains the whole working routine of the program as regards the following: how do we identify facts for verification; what kind of topics are given priorities for analysis; how do we collect data; how verdicts are issued, etc.

According to this methodology, one of the objectives of our work is to keep the balance. Although FactCheck’s analysts select statements for verification based on facts given in the statements, it can happen frequently that we find numerous statements of one party/politician whilst none can be found on other parties/politicians. Here we are not to blame; however, we still try to equally cover all the parties/politicians and make sure that articles dedicated to their statements are somehow equal as well. This approach is particularly important during the election campaign period.

A methodology of how debunking online hoaxes and mis/disinformation works is also published on the same section on FactCheck.ge. FactCheck's debunking team monitors online media and social networks through Meta's analytical tool CrowdTangle. FactCheck Georgia also reviews the veracity of online content submitted by its readers. The following criteria are considered when selecting online claims for verification, provided by Meta and readers, as well as those revealed as a result of FactCheck Georgia’s own monitoring: 1) whether a specific claim is verifiable; 2) the importance and relevance of the information to society; 3) the virality of the claim and its possible impact on society. 

Applicant is using advanced and detailed methodology of selection of selection of clams explaining the sources of claims, decision making principles, factors and reasons. This document is published here https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია

Based on the analysis of randomly selected stories published during last year it is evidently seen that FactCheck Georgia is using the same methodology for all claims, the sources used by FactCheck.ge to confirm facts are neutral and don't influence the accuracy of the factcheck, so the reader might reasonably conclude the interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided.  

Content analysis of randomly selected stories published during last year had shown no evidences of support of any political party or politician or company, publications reviewed are neither supporting any policy nor advocating any initiative.

The methodology of FactCheck Georgia (see: https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია) outlines three key objectives of our work, which are as follow: (1) Finding the Truth – It is FactCheck’s top objective to show the reader where the truth is. (2) Transparency of Sources – Making references to all sources used in an article. (3) Multiple Verification – Verification of facts and data as many times and as many sources as possible. In addition, it precisely determines the major standards and principles for FactCheckers to conduct their work. Depending on these principles leave no space for partisanship and make our work unbiased and objective.

Furthermore, as a verified signatory of IFCN, we also publish its main principles (https://factcheck.ge/en/სარედაქციო-კოდექსი) on our website let readers know to what standards we are adhering as an organization. Finally, FactCheck Georgia works in consideration of the internal guideline for FactCheck analysts (please find attached), which mentions non-partisanship as the main obligation for FactCheck team members. 

The Code of conduct and Methodology published on https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია) have clear statements regarding preventing possible conflict of interest or support of political parties or any kind of bias or partisanship.

Random check of stories published during last year confirmed that in all cases FactCheck.ge identifies the sources of information proving or undermining facts that are checked including direct links to reliable information or source so the audience can replicate the journalists work..

All the fact-check pieces that were randomly selected and analysed are based on the primary sources.

Random check of several stories published during last year had shown that the FactCheck Georgia team is always looking for more than one source of facts and evidences and doing in-depth analysis of the claims that are verified. 

Based on the analysis of the content, it is evidently seen the unbiased approach, using neutral sources for verification of facts, so the reader might reasonably conclude the interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided, and if it goes about politicians FactCheck Georgia clearly notices the interest of these sources.

FactCheck Georgia is a program of Georgia’s Reforms Associates (GRASS), an independent, non-partisan, non-governmental policy watchdog and think tank (https://grass.org.ge/en). GRASS is legally registered at the National Agency of Public Registry. Please find the registration document attached below.

FactCheck.ge is the project of NGO Georgian Reforms Associates (GRASS) that is registered as non-profit and non-government organisation. The website of GRASS has the page https://grass.org.ge/en/projects  with the spreadsheet containing all sources of funding of FactCheck.ge. 

The About Us section on GRASS's website mentions that GRASS is a non-partisan, non-governmental policy watchdog and multi-profile think tank which provides policy recommendations to the government, conducts research-based analysis, and raises public interest and awareness on a wide range of public policy issues (see: shorturl.at/kyBH1). GRASS publicly lists sources of funding for each program, including for FactCheck, on its web page.

See: http://grass.org.ge/en/projects/

FactCheck Georgia places the badges of the program donor organizations on its website:

See: https://factcheck.ge/en/პროექტის-მხარდამჭერები 

FactCheck is noted as the project at Grass website https://grass.org.ge/en/projects

At the same time GRASS is noted as the founder of FactCheck.ge at https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb  

A supreme managing body of GRASS is a board, which is composed of distinguished academics and CSO representatives (see the biographies of board members: https://grass.org.ge/en/grass-is-gundi/board). The board is responsible for determining the strategic direction of the organization and ensuring its independence from political or any kind of malign influence.

The daily decisions in GRASS are made by the central staff of the organization, including the director, program managers, program coordinators, and financial manager. FactCheck editor is accountable to the director. However, the director is solely engaged in the managerial side of the program and does not interfere with editorial independence. As noted in the FactCheck Georgia's methodology (see: https://bit.ly/2UTboPv) editorial procedures are as follows:

When FactCheck’s analyst finishes an article, he/she informs FactCheck’s editor (and chief economist if the article is on the economy), and the process of redacting the article begins. In the process of editing the article, the editor provides comments on the content and style as well as remarks of a technical character as required. In this process, the article might return to the author with respective comments/remarks until it is finalized. After the editing stage of the article is finished, the editor-in-chief and the author of an article agree on the final verdict and the article is then published on FactCheck’s website. If the two cannot reach a respective consensus, the verdict issue is reviewed by the editorial board and the decision is made through voting.

The organisational management procedure, responsibilities and duties, as well as editorial control system are in a good shape and described here https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია                                                                                                            

FactCheck Team: https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/team (please click on the names for biographies)

GRASS Team: https://grass.org.ge/en/grass-is-gundi/our-team  

Both GRASS and FactCheck.ge have sections at their websites with detailed information about team members including biographiess.

At the end of the FactCheck Methodology document (see: https://bit.ly/2UTboPv) readers are invited to interact with FactCheck Georgia should they have any questions. To this end, e-mail address, telephone numbers, and Facebook address are indicated. In addition:

- Readers can send their claims through the contact section of the program web page, which allows them to directly send their message to the program team - https://factcheck.ge/en/contact

- FactCheck offers a service, Check Your Fact, which gives the public an opportunity to verify facts that are of particular interest to them - https://factcheck.ge/en/check-your-fact

- We also engage with the audience mostly with the Facebook page, where readers can comment on each of our content or directly send inbox messages to our team. 

The users are encouraged to communicate through several channels including webpage itself, mailing, social media accounts.

Contact button located at the top of the landing page that leads to this page https://factcheck.ge/en/contact is easily to be found and gives fast solution to those who would like to give a feedback to the newsroom.

"Check your Facts" button is another good option to communicate.

Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn social networks are another channels of communication with the audience.

FactCheck Methodology: https://bit.ly/2UTboPv

Please aslo find attached the guideline document below:     

The file of Fact-checking Guide provided additionally show fair and professional approach to the methodology of fact-checks.

Thorough and detailed methodology is also published here https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია 

All randomly selected and analysed stories published during last three month showed using the same approach and methodology in selecting claims principles as well as verification process and are explaining the importance of providing trustworthy information to the people. The topics selected for verification are based on importance to the society and public interest criteria.

All randomly selected and analysed stories published during last three month show that the newsroom is seeking equally for both, proving and undermining claim facts providing them to the reader.  

Review of a randomly selected stories published during last three month showed that FactCheck.ge has an equal, unbiased and neutral approach to the sources of claims as well as to the sources proving claims with equal treatment and standards to all of them.                                                                                                            

Review and analysis of randomly selected stories published during last three month showed that FactCheck.ge newsroom is seeking to contact those who made the claim as well as using alternate sources. 

FactCheck offers a service, Check Your Fact (https://factcheck.ge/en/check-your-fact), which gives the public an opportunity to verify facts that are of particular interest to them. Readers can also send their claims through the contact section of the program web page (https://factcheck.ge/en/contact), which allows them to directly submit their messages to the program team. 

In addition, we engage with the audience with our Facebook page, where readers can comment on each post or directly send inbox messages to our team (https://www.facebook.com/Factcheck.ge). In case they provide relevant comments, we encourage users to submit their claims for further verification. 

FactCheck Georgia is encouraging users to submit their requests for fact-checking.

"Check your Facts" button located at the upper right corner of the screen is the excellent tool leading to the form that anybody can fill and submit.

Another tool is the Facebook profile for encouraging users to send facts to be checked as well as placing video explainers and using chatbot.

Correction policy is part of the program's methodology. Particularly, FactCheck Georgia allows for the possibility that a mistake can occur in its work. Therefore, in the case politicians or readers disagree with particular research and judgment, FactCheck Georgia urges them to provide their claims and arguments. The received information is closely examined by the FactCheck board in due time and in the event of their validity, research, as well as the verdict, is revised or corrected accordingly.

In case a significant piece of information is added to the research/article, but the addition does not lead to a change of the verdict, we revise our article; however, if the added information alters the issued verdict the article is corrected. This practice serves the purpose of ensuring maximum objectivity and political impartiality in FactCheck’s work.

Please see "Rectifying Mistakes in FactCheck’s Article" in the FactCheck Methodology: https://bit.ly/2UTboPv

In addition, concerning the articles that are used for Facebook’s third-party fact-checking program, FactCheck Georgia has published a separate guideline on issuing corrections and appeals for the Facebook publishers (see: https://factcheck.ge/en/Dispute-Correction). We have also created a separate email address (appeals@factcheck.ge) that is used for the appeals/correction requests within FactCheck’s work of Facebook’s third-party fact-checking program.

FactCheck.ge has advanced correction and complaints policy published here https://factcheck.ge/en/chven-shesaxeb/მეთოდოლოგია  and on https://factcheck.ge/en/Dispute-Correction 

Reviewing of FactCheck.ge correction policy and dispute/correction guideline had proven that both documents meet the criteria and set the rules of identifying, treating, correcting mistakes as well as correcting/updating verdicts and ratings.

Three corrections were made during the previous year.

The first one was made to the following article: https://factcheck.ge/en/story/41094--reconstruction-of-the-aforementioned-sights-kutaisi-hundred-steps-stairs-and-the-colchis-fountain-will-begin-very-shortly 

Initially, FactCheck’s verdict for this statement was FALSE. After communication with Kutaisi City Hall, the verdict was amended and respectively, our conclusion was also modified and relevant changes were made in the text. In the initial version of the article, prior to the amendment, the wording of the conclusion was as follows: “Therefore, that part of the Mayor’s statement that contracts have been signed and companies will start work very shortly is true. However, in the case of the Hundred-Steps Stairs, despite multiple extensions of the deadline, work is still incomplete. Therefore, FactCheck concludes that Ioseb Khakhaleishvili’s pledge is being kept, although the protracted process is precisely indicative of those shortcomings which Mr Khakhaleishvili denied in this statement. As a result, FactCheck gives a FALSE verdict to this statement.”

The second correction was made to the following article - https://factcheck.ge/ka/story/40309. The article was published within Meta’s Third-Party Fact-Checking Program and was debunking a manipulative story that spread on Facebook and wrongly attributed a fake quote to one of the Georgian activists (Varlam Goletiani). Initially, the article named one of the online media agencies, “Rezonansi” as one of the platforms where misinformation was spread. “Rezonansi” submitted its appeal through our appeal channel specifically designed for disputes concerning articles that are produced within Third-Party Fact-Checking Program. “Rezonansi” provided their arguments, proving that their content did not include false attribution. FactCheck.ge’s editorial board considering their arguments, decided to lift the ranking from "Rezonansi". The article was updated with an editor’s note, explicitly noting what was corrected.

The third correction was made to the following article - https://factcheck.ge/ka/story/40853. This correction was not made due to an external appeal, but the mistake was found in-house. The article was about Oleksiy Arestovych, adviser to the President of Ukraine. Social media posts were spread claiming that Mr. Arestovych said the following: “If the West does not actively help Ukraine, millions of Ukrainians will go to the side of Russia, and then the West will have to defend itself from Russia." Initially, the debunking article at FactCheck.ge said that the quote was entirely fabricated. However, later it was confirmed that he indeed had made such a statement. Immediately a correction was made to the article, explaining the mistake in the first edition and also resulting in a change to the rating. The corrected article includes the word “corrected” in the title. 

In yet another case, minister of economy Natia Turnava appealed to FactCheck to change the verdict concerning her statement. After reviewing the verdict, FactCheck decided not to make any changes and informed the minister about justification in writing. Specifically, her arguments about the growth of FDI did not take into consideration inaccurate figures, as well as dynamics of the context. As a result, her statement was rated as Lie. For more information, please see the article: https://factcheck.ge/ka/story/40313-fdi-იზრდება-და-ადრე-არსებული-ნეგატიური-დინამიკა-შეცვლილია 

Provided examples had proven that correction policy of FactCheck.ge is correctly implemented, appropriately and honestly enforced and applied in the cases where correction or update is needed.

FactCheck Georgia publishes the code of principles on its site (https://factcheck.ge/ka/სარედაქციო-კოდექსი). The same page allows readers to submit a complaint to IFCN If they believe that FactCheck Georgia is violating these principles. A link to the complaints page on the IFCN site is also provided.

The Code of conduct published here https://factcheck.ge/ka/სარედაქციო-კოდექსი has all needed information so if the website user will need to file the complaint to IFCN it can be easily done.

FactCheck.ge is solely factchecking project and has all information on the own web-site.