We're Making Enhancements! The IFCN Code of Principles site is temporarily unavailable due to maintenance. We will be back online soon. Thank you for your patience. For urgent inquiries, please contact us at info@ifcn.org.

FactCheckNI

Organization: FactCheckNI
Applicant: Orna YOUNG
Assessor: Raymond Joseph

Background

FactCheckNI was established in 2015 “as a response to the immediate need presented by the impact of online rumours and misinformation in further marginalising communities in Northern Ireland,”

The catalyst for its launch was research conducted by managing director and co-founder, Dr. Orna Young, who found that information being shared on social media was having a detrimental impact on the nature of inter-communal relations. FactCheckNI was established as a direct response to counteract this damaging mis- and disinformation.

I have assessed FactCheckNI’s annual IFCN accreditation application over several years and it is most satisfying to see how the organisation has matured and extended its fact-checking and other services, in spite of its clearly limited resources.

Compared to many other fact-checking organisations, FactCheckNI has a very small staff, comprising two people - an executive director and an editor – who work on a part-time basis. They are complemented by three additional company directors and others in an advisory group. FactCheckNI also uses several volunteer researchers and commissioned writers to assist with fact-checking.

Yet, in spite of these limited resources, FactCheckNI regularly publishes a wide variety of fact-checks on political and other issues relevant to the people of Northern Ireland. Fact-checks are divided into eight subject areas: Economy, education, elections, environment, Europe, health, law, and peace.

Besides fact-checking, FactCheckNI also provides training courses, events, and educational resources. In addition, it also provides consultancy services “in the specialisation “of fact-checking, to individual clients and academic research projects.”

The site is easy to navigate via a series of tabs – “Fact-checks”, “About Us”, “Toolkit”, “Training”, “Contact and “Submit a Claim” - on a navigation bar running across the top of all pages. This simple navigation and ease of finding important information could serve as a template for newer organisations to be compliant with IFCN requirements when setting up their sites.

I am also impressed with the fact-checking toolkit that is included on the FactCheckNI website, which gives easy-to-understand, practical advice to help stamp out false news.” It also has several guides covering various aspects of fact-checking, including practical advice on how to recognise false news.

Assessment Conclusion

FactCheckNI has met all the criteria for the renewal of its IFCN accreditation. 

on 28-Nov-2022 (1 year ago)

Raymond Joseph assesses application as Compliant

A short summary in native publishing language

See background

Section 1: Eligibility to be a signatory

To be eligible to be a signatory, applicants must meet these six criteria

  • 1.1 The applicant is a legally registered organization, or a distinct team or unit within a legally registered organization, and details of this are easily found on its website.
  • 1.2 The team, unit or organization is set up exclusively for the purpose of fact-checking.
  • 1.3 The applicant has published an average of at least one fact check a week over the course of the six months prior to the date of application. For applicants from countries with at least 5 or more verified signatories need to have at least a fact check a week over the twelve months of publishing track. Consult to factchecknet@poynter.org for confirmation.
  • 1.4 On average, at least 75% of the applicant’s fact checks focus on claims related to issues that, in the view of the IFCN, relate to or could have an impact on the welfare or well-being of individuals, the general public or society.
  • 1.5 The applicant’s editorial output is not, in the view of the IFCN, controlled by the state, a political party or politician.
  • 1.6 If the organization receives funding from local or foreign state or political sources, it provides a statement on its site setting out to the satisfaction of the IFCN, how it ensures its funders do not influence the findings of its reports.

Criteria 1.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please explain where on your website you set out information about your organization’s legal status and how this complies with criteria. Attach a link to the relevant page of your website.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago)

FactCheckNI CIC is a company limited by guarantee, registered in Northern Ireland at Companies House (Company Registration Number: NI660549). The company was established with the objective of to improve fact-checking and critical thinking skills in Northern Ireland.The company has declared itself as a non-profit, Community Interest Company (CIC), where all generated surplus income will be reinvested in the company. Company files are lodged at Companies House and can be found here: https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/NI660549

https://factcheckni.org/about/

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI CIC is a company limited by guarantee, registered in Northern Ireland at Companies House. Its Company Registration Number is NI660549). The company was established with the objective of improving fact-checking and critical thinking skills in Northern Ireland. The company has declared itself as a non-profit, Community Interest Company (CIC), where all generated surplus income is reinvested in the company. 

Company files are lodged at Companies House and can be found here: See: https://bit.ly/3fQUsXg 

Details of the organization's legal status can be found on the "About" page - which explains the organisation's legal status and also includes a link to the Companies House listing.


done_all 1.1 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 1.2
Proof you meet criteria
Please answer the following questions – (see notes in Guidelines for Application on how to answer)

 1. When and why was your fact-checking operation started?
 2. How many people work or volunteer in the organization and what are their roles?
 3. What different activities does your organization carry out?
 4. What are the goals of your fact-checking operation over the coming year?

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI was initially established in 2015 as a response to the immediate need presented by the impact of online rumours and misinformation in further marginalising communities in Northern Ireland. Evidence from research conducted by managing director and co-founder, Dr Orna Young, found that information being shared on social media was having a detrimental impact on the nature of inter-communal relations. FactCheckNI was established as a direct response to this need.

There are two people who provide work to FactCheckNI, on a part-time basis: an executive director and an editor. They are complemented by three additional company directors and others in an advisory group. Furthermore, there are several volunteer researchers and commissioned writers. FactCheckNI

FactCheckNI provides the public with accurate, fair, and reliable fact-check and explainer articles. FactCheckNI provides training courses, events, and educational resources. FactCheckNI also provides consultancy services in the specialisation of fact checking, to individual clients and academic research projects.

FactCheckNI’s goals over the coming year include increasing our capacity to produce fact check articles and thus the volume of available fact checked information in Northern Ireland. We also want to build on our existing training offering, including blended learning (training with additional education support) and asynchronous training (e.g. modules that can be completed on a self-paced, individual basis). We continue to expand our fact-checking training into formal education settings.

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

1) FactCheckNI was initially established in 2015 "as a response to the immediate need presented by the impact of online rumours and misinformation in further marginalising communities in Northern Ireland. 

"Evidence from research conducted by managing director and co-founder, , found that information being shared on social media was having a detrimental impact on the nature of inter-communal relations. FactCheckNI was established as a direct response to this need."

2) There are two people who provide work to FactCheckNI, on a part-time basis: an executive director and an editor. They are complemented by three additional company directors and others in an advisory group. FactCheckNI also makes use of several volunteer researchers and commissioned writers.

3) "FactCheckNI provides the public with accurate, fair, and reliable fact-check and explainer articles. FactCheckNI provides training courses, events, and educational resources. FactCheckNI also provides consultancy services in the specialisation of fact-checking, to individual clients and academic research projects."

4) FactCheckNI’s goals over the coming year include increasing our capacity to produce fact-check articles and thus the volume of available fact-checked information in Northern Ireland.

5) "We also want to build on our existing training offering, including blended learning (training with additional education support) and asynchronous training (e.g. modules that can be completed on a self-paced, individual basis). We continue to expand our fact-checking training into formal education settings."


done_all 1.2 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 1.3
Proof you meet criteria
- The applicant has published an average of at least one fact check a week over the course of the six months prior to the date of application.
- For applicants from countries with at least 5 or more verified signatories need to have at least a fact check a week over the twelve months of publishing track.
- Consult to factchecknet@poynter.org for confirmation.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago

1. Are children who take a COVID-19 vaccine 52 times more likely to suffer an early death?

2. Is the UK ranked 14th in Europe for the number of asylum seekers it processes and accepts?

3. Do 20% of EU customs checks take place in the Irish Sea?

4. UUP manifesto - free school meals education attainment gap

5. SF manifesto - a result of the DUP’s collapse of the Executive there remains £334 million in unallocated funds which could have gone to alleviating some of the pressures facing workers and families.

6. Do nearly 30% of NI’s carbon emissions come from farming, compared with 10% in the rest of the UK?

7. Do 25 of NI’s 27 main ‘economic hubs’ have creaking water and sewage infrastructure that is holding back development?

8. SDLP Manifesto - the £20 universal credit cut marked the largest overnight welfare cut since WWII

9. Are 40,000 people in NI on the Housing Executive waiting list, with 30,000 of those in housing stress?

10. UUP voters going to give transfer votes to non-unionist parties ahead of other unionist parties?

11. UUP manifesto - over 40,000 people in Northern Ireland are on the NI 12. Housing Executive (NIHE) waiting list of whom 30,000 are in ‘housing stress’.

12. How is the NI Protocol affecting the local cost of living?

13. Do 140 people per year die while fishing in Irish waters?

14. Is the Belfast-Derry/Londonderry train no quicker than it was during Victorian times?

15. Is Belfast the most lucrative city in the UK for students’ landlords?

16. Do less than 0.03% of the population of Northern Ireland have a vote in the Conservative Party leadership election 2022?

17. When is 40.3 not higher than 39.6?

18. Is NI subject to EU fuel VAT rates, which cannot be reduced below 5%? 

19. Workers’ wages have decreased by 3.7% on average from May?

20. Is childcare the biggest cost for NI families, after housing?

21. Does Northern Ireland have the highest rate of infant mortality in Europe?

22. Have the courts said NI schools are discriminatory, and ordered them to stop indoctrinating pupils into Christianity?

23. Will £400m of unspent public funds be wiped out by a budget deficit?

24. Does the UK have more food banks than McDonald’s?

Files Attached
description IFCN 1.3 .docx (9 KB)
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

Fact-CheckNI submitted a list of 24 fact-checks on different issues as proof that it published at least one fact-check a week as required. I found that they have met the necessary criteria. See attached list of hyperlinked fact-checks.

Files Attached
description fact-check links sub... (17 KB)
done_all 1.3 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 1.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous three months. No additional information required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

An assessment of both fact-checks submitted with this application, as well as a random assessment of published fact-checks during the period under review reveals that FactCheckNI has exceeded the number of fact-checks required to be compliant.


done_all 1.4 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 1.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please explain any commercial, financial and/or institutional relationship your organization has to the state, politicians or political parties in the country or countries you cover. Also explain funding or support received from foreign as well as local state or political actors over the previous financial year.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago

On 1 April 2018, we were awarded a grant of 208,740 euros (c. £181,056) from the Horizon 2020 Programme at the European Commission. FactCheckNI is a full partner organisation of a research and development project — Co-inform — led by Stockholm University. The Co-inform project aims to create socio-technical solutions with citizens, journalists, and policymakers. The Co-inform project runs from 1 April 2018 to 30 June 2021.

In May 2021, FactCheckNI was awarded £5,000 by the Department of Finance in Northern Ireland for Open Data: COVID-19 Facts; this project produced a number of fact-checked articles and infrographics, to provide the public with factually accurate information about the impacts of Covid-19 and the efforts being made to counter Covid-19.

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI was awarded a grant of 208,740 euros on April 1, 2018, from the Horizon 2020 Programme at the European Commission. 

FactCheckNI is a full partner organisation of a research and development project — Co-inform — led by Stockholm University. This project aims to create socio-technical solutions with citizens, journalists, and policymakers and runs from 1 April 2018 to 30 June 2021.

In May 2021, FactCheckNI was awarded £5,000 by the Department of Finance in Northern Ireland for a project known as Open Data: COVID-19 Facts. The project produced a number of fact-checked articles and infographics that provided factually accurate information about the impacts of Covid-19, and the efforts being made to counter the virus.

See: https:///3OE9VcF 


done_all 1.5 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 1.6
Proof you meet criteria
If you confirmed the organization receives funding from local or foreign state or political sources, provide a link to where on your website you set out how you ensure the editorial independence of your work.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 2 years ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI is transparent about its sources of funding, which are all published on its website.

It states unequivocally: "We are transparent about our funding sources. We ensure that funders have no influence over the conclusions that we reach in our fact-checks." See:  


done_all 1.6 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Section 2: A commitment to Non-partisanship and Fairness

To be compliant on nonpartisanship and fairness, applicants must meet these five criteria

  • 2.1 The applicant fact-checks using the same high standards of evidence and judgement for equivalent claims regardless of who made the claim.
  • 2.2 The applicant does not unduly concentrate its fact-checking on any one side, considers the reach and importance of claims it selects to check and publishes a short statement on its website to set out how it selects claims to check.
  • 2.3 The applicant discloses in its fact checks relevant interests of the sources it quotes where the reader might reasonably conclude those interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided. It also discloses in its fact checks any commercial or other such relationships it has that a member of the public might reasonably conclude could influence the findings of the fact check.
  • 2.4 The applicant is not as an organization affiliated with nor declares or shows support for any party, any politician or political candidate, nor does it advocate for or against any policy positions on any issues save for transparency and accuracy in public debate.
  • 2.5 The applicant sets out its policy on non-partisanship for staff on its site. Save for the issues of accuracy and transparency, the applicant’s staff do not get involved in advocacy or publicise their views on policy issues the organization might fact check in such a way as might lead a reasonable member of the public to see the organization’s work as biased.

Criteria 2.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please share links to 10 fact checks published over the past year that you believe demonstrate your non-partisanship.
Please briefly explain how the fact checks selected show that (I) you use the same high standards of evidence for equivalent claims, (II) follow the same essential process for every fact check and (III) let the evidence dictate your conclusions.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago

The selection of our fact checks below demonstrate our consistent research methodology, including the discovery of primary sources, a thorough editorial review process, and publishing our conclusions, regardless of verdict (e.g. claims that are validated as well as rebuked).

It is also important to consider the nature of societal divisions and party structure in Northern Ireland, based mainly on national identities. This is also reflected in people’s choice of media. FactCheckNI works hard to ensure a broad coverage of political orientations, suggested by the following examples:

Is childcare the biggest cost for NI families, after housing? (DUP; British/Unionist party; political right)

Was the Tories’ £20 cut to Universal Credit the biggest overnight drop in welfare since World War II? (SDLP; Irish/Nationalist party; political centre-left)

Did average pay plummet by 3.7% in the three months from May? (Sinn Fein; Irish/Republican party; political left)

Are children entitled to free school meals 29 percentage points less likely than their peers to get good GCSEs? Has this attainment gap barely closed in over a decade? (UUP; British/Unionist; political right)

Do nearly 30% of NI’s carbon emissions come from farming, compared with 10% in the rest of the UK? (APNI; constitutionally agnostic; political centre)

Do 140 people per year die while fishing in Irish waters? (BBC NI; Radio programme; general audience)

Is Belfast the most lucrative city in the UK for students’ landlords? (Belfast Telegraph; newspaper; general audience)

Is childcare the biggest cost for NI families, after housing? (BBC NI; Radio programme; general audience)

Has the economy in Derry/Londonderry contracted 21% since 2007? (The Derry Journal; regional newspaper; general audience)

Does Northern Ireland spend least per pupil? (BBC News NI; Radio programme ; general audience)

Files Attached
description IFCN 2.1.docx (8 KB)
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI makes the point that it is important to consider the nature of societal divisions and party structure in Northern Ireland, based mainly on national identities. This is also reflected in people’s choice of media. FactCheckNI works hard to ensure broad coverage of political orientations, it says in its application. 

The (attached) examples of fact-checks submitted with this application confirm that the subjects and issues it has fact-checked span the full political, cultural, and religious spectrum found in Northern Ireland society.

From the application: "The selection of our fact checks demonstrates our consistent research methodology, including the discovery of primary sources, a thorough editorial review process, and publishing of our conclusions, regardless of the verdict (e.g. claims that are validated as well as rebuked)."

See "Commitment to Nonpartisanship and Fairness" https://bit.ly/3TVd7l7 

"No matter the claim, we use the same standard for every fact check. We follow the same process for every fact check and let the evidence dictate our conclusions. We do not concentrate our fact-checking on any one side or lobby. We do not advocate or take policy positions on the issues we fact-check.

See also "Commitment to Standards and Transparency of Methodology

"We explain the methodology we use to select, research, write, edit, publish and correct our fact checks. We look for and test evidence that will support and challenges claims that we investigate. We encourage readers to send us claims to fact-check and are transparent on why and how we fact-check." https://bit.ly/3TVd7l7 

See: "Reflecting" https://bit.ly/3hXJDpm

On a quarterly basis — and sometimes more often during election periods — FactCheckNI staff and directors will consider the mix of topics being fact-checked, and whether a range of political claims is being addressed. While we strive for breadth and balance, we are aware that particular circumstances (a health pandemic or a particularly combative politician) can understandably skew that sense of balance."

"Everyone involved at FactCheckNI — volunteers, interns, committee members, team managers, and the board — work under the fundamental principles of impartiality, transparency and accuracy; these are reflected in our organisation’s Code of Conduct.” https://bit.ly/3TVd7l7 

Commitment to Nonpartisanship and Fairness: "No matter the claim, we use the same standard for every fact check. We follow the same process for every fact check and let the evidence dictate our conclusions. We do not concentrate our fact-checking on any one side or lobby. We do not advocate or take policy positions on the issues we fact-check.": See https://bit.ly/3TVd7l7

Files Attached
description factchecks illustrat... (16 KB)
done_all 2.1 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 2.2
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to a place on your website where you explain how you select claims to check, explaining how you ensure you do not unduly concentrate your fact-checking on any one side, and how you consider the reach and importance of the claims you select to check.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 2 years ago
Our process of fact checking can be read online: https://factcheckni.org/about/process/
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI's fact-checking process, including how it chooses claims to investigate, protocols in place to prevent bias or undue concentration on only one side is clearly spelled out on its website: See process: https:///3hXJDpm 


done_all 2.2 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 2.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous year. No additional information required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

Having undertaken a random assessment of Fact-CheckNI fact-checks conducted over the past 12 months I am satisfied that FactCheckNI meets the required criteria, which requires consideration of the reach and importance of claims it selects to check. It also discloses on its website how it selects claims to check.

See "Claim Selection": 


done_all 2.3 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 2.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous year. No additional information required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

I am satisfied that FactCheckNI discloses the relevant interests of the sources it quotes in its fact checks, where a reader might reasonably conclude those interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence they provide. It also discloses in its fact-checks any commercial or other such relationships that a member of the public might reasonably conclude could influence the findings of the fact-check.


done_all 2.4 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 2.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to a place on your website where you publish a statement setting out your policy on non-partisanship for staff and how it ensures the organization meets this criteria.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 2 years ago

On the website page that explains our commitment to the IFCN Code of Principles, we declare: “Everyone involved at FactCheckNI — volunteers, interns, committee members, team managers and the board — work under the fundamental principles of impartiality, transparency and accuracy; these are reflected in our organisation’s Code of Conduct.”

In this statement there is a further link to our organisation’s Code of Conduct.

https://factcheckni.org/about/code-of-principles/

https://factcheckni.org/about/policies/code-of-conduct/

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactcheckNI's commitment to the IFCN Code of Principles is made clear on its website.  

It says: "Everyone involved at FactCheckNI — volunteers, interns, committee members, team managers, and the board — work under the fundamental principles of impartiality, transparency, and accuracy; these are reflected in our organisation’s Code of Conduct.” - See  


done_all 2.5 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Section 3: A commitment to Standards and Transparency of Sources

To be compliant on sources, applicants must meet these four criteria

  • 3.1 The applicant identifies the source of all significant evidence used in their fact checks, providing relevant links where the source is available online, in such a way that users can replicate their work if they wish. In cases where identifying the source would compromise the source’s personal security, the applicant provides as much detail as compatible with the source’s safety.
  • 3.2 The applicant uses the best available primary, not secondary, sources of evidence wherever suitable primary sources are available. Where suitable primary sources are not available, the applicant explains the use of a secondary source.
  • 3.3 The applicant checks all key elements of claims against more than one named source of evidence save where the one source is the only source relevant on the topic.
  • 3.4 The applicant identifies in its fact checks the relevant interests of the sources it uses where the reader might reasonably conclude those interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided.

Criteria 3.1
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

Having done a random assessment of published fact-checks, I am satisfied that FactCheckNI adequately identifies its sources, and also links to those that are available online. This makes it possible for users to users to replicate the fact-check. In cases where identifying the source could compromise their personal security, I am satisfied that enough information is provided to establish the credibility and expertise of the source on the fact-checked issue.


done_all 3.1 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 3.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

Based on a random assessment of published fact-checks, I am satisfied that FactCheckNI uses the best available primary. In instances where suitable primary sources are not available, they explain the use of a secondary source.


done_all 3.2 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 3.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

I am satisfied that FactCheckNI does not publish single-source fact-checks. Based on a random assessment of published fact-checks, I found they use more than one named source of evidence unless a source is the only one relevant to the topic.


done_all 3.3 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 3.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

I am satisfied that FactCheckNI identifies any relevant interests a source may have, particularly where a reader might conclude that these interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided in a fact-check.


done_all 3.4 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Section 4: A commitment to Transparency of Funding & Organization

To be compliant on funding and organization, applicants must meet these five criteria

  • 4.1 Applicants that are independent organizations have a page on their website detailing each source of funding accounting for 5% or more of total revenue for its previous financial year. This page also sets out the legal form in which the organization is registered (e.g. as a non-profit, as a company etc).
  • 4.2 Applicants that are the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization make a statement on ownership.
  • 4.3 A statement on the applicant’s website sets out the applicant’s organizational structure and makes clear how and by whom editorial control is exercised.
  • 4.4 A page on the applicant’s website details the professional biography of all those who, according to the organizational structure and play a significant part in its editorial output.
  • 4.5 The applicant provides easy means on its website and/or via social media for users to communicate with the editorial team.

Criteria 4.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please confirm whether you are an ‘independent organization’
or ‘the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization’ and share proof of this organizational status.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 2 years ago

Independent organisation; see attached file.

Files Attached
picture_as_pdf FactCheckNI CIC - Ce... (79 KB)
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI is an indepenent organsiation. (See 1.1 for proof of registration). See also Companies House listing:  

FactCheckNI CIC - Certificate Incorporation - attached.

Files Attached
picture_as_pdf FactCheckNI CIC - Ce... (83 KB)
done_all 4.1 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 4.2
Proof you meet criteria
If your organization is an “independent organization”, please share a link to the page on your website where you detail your funding and indicate the legal form in which the organization is registered (e.g. as a non-profit, as a company etc).
If your organization is “the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization”, please share a link to the statement on your website about your ownership.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 2 years ago

Information about FactCheckNI sources of funding is published online: https://factcheckni.org/about/funding/

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI CIC is a company limited by guarantee, registered in Northern Ireland at Companies House (Company Registration Number: NI660549). The company has declared itself as a non-profit, Community Interest Company (CIC), where all generated surplus income is reinvested in the company.

Details of the organisation's registration and legal status can be found on the "About" page - - which explains the organisation's legal status and also includes a link to the Companies House listing:  


done_all 4.2 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 4.3
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you set out your organizational structure, making clear how and by whom editorial control is exercised.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 2 years ago

At FactCheckNI, there are two regular workers that make up the senior management team, which works in a collaborative style. The primary responsibilities of each are provided in the professional biographies published online. Editorial policy is explained in our fact-checking process, which is published online. Articles are compiled by the editor, then reviewed by at least one other member of the team before publishing. More complex or politically sensitive topics will be forwarded to a third person. The senior management team is complemented by two additional company directors and an advisory group, with details of all published online.

https://factcheckni.org/about/personnel/

https://factcheckni.org/about/process/

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI has two full-time workers that make up its senior management team. The senior management team is complemented by two additional company directors and an advisory group. See  and  

The primary responsibilities of each are provided in the professional biographies published online.  
See also:  

There is also a full list of fact-check authors, most of whom are freelancers:  

The editorial policy is explained online in FactCheckNI (See "Process": https://bit.ly/3hXJDpm)

"Fact-check articles are compiled by the editor and then reviewed by at least one other member of the team before publication. More complex or politically sensitive topics are forwarded to a third person for further review."

FactCheckNI states on its site that it has full editorial control over what it fact-checks and what it concludes in its findings.


done_all 4.3 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 4.4
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you set out the professional biographies of those who play a significant part in your organization’s editorial output.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

There are two people who provide work to FactCheckNI, on a part-time basis: an executive director and an editor.
They are complemented by three additional company directors and others in an advisory group. There are also several volunteer researchers and commissioned writers.



done_all 4.4 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 4.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you encourage users to communicate with your editorial team.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago

Our website’s Contact page describes how people can contact us with general queries, claim queries, media queries, and volunteering queries.

https://factcheckni.org/contact/

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

People can contact FactCheckNI via a "Contact" tab in the navigation bar across the top of all the website pages. The contact page has details of how to contact them for general queries, claim queries, media queries, and volunteering queries. See: https://bit.ly/3EWEO8P 

Next to the contact tab is a prominent "submit a claim" tab that takes readers to a page where there is a form to submit a claim for fact-checking. This page also includes an explanation of what they can, and cannot, fact-check. See: https://bit.ly/3AQBoSu 

FactCheckNI is also active on several social media platforms: they are FB, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram and Mastodon.


done_all 4.5 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Section 5: A commitment to Standards and Transparency of Methodology

To be compliant on methodology, applicants must meet these six criteria

  • 5.1 The applicant publishes on its website a statement about the methodology it uses to select, research, write and publish its fact checks.
  • 5.2 The applicant selects claims to check based primarily on the reach and importance of the claims, and where possible explains the reason for choosing the claim to check.
  • 5.3 The applicant sets out in its fact checks relevant evidence that appears to support the claim as well as relevant evidence that appears to undermine it.
  • 5.4 The applicant in its fact checks assesses the merits of the evidence found using the same high standards applied to evidence on equivalent claims, regardless of who made the claim.
  • 5.5 The applicant seeks where possible to contact those who made the claim to seek supporting evidence, noting that (I) this is often not possible with online claims, (II) if the person who makes the claim fails to reply in a timely way this should not impede the fact check, (III) if a speaker adds caveats to the claim, the fact-checker should be free to continue with checking the original claim, (IV) fact-checkers may not wish to contact the person who made the claim for safety or other legitimate reasons.
  • 5.6 The applicant encourages users to send in claims to check, while making it clear what readers can legitimately expect will be fact-checked and what isn’t fact-checkable.

Criteria 5.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a link to the statement on your website that explains the methodology you use to select, research, write and publish your fact checks.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 2 years ago

Our fact-checking methodology is explained online: https://factcheckni.org/about/process/

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI's website clearly explains its methodology, including its claim selection, research, and rating systems. It also explains the editorial workflow and responsibilities.


done_all 5.1 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 5.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

I am satisfied that FactChekNI selects claims to check based primarily on the reach and importance of the claims, and where possible explains the reason for choosing the claim to check. 


done_all 5.2 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 5.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

I am satisfied that FactCheckNI presents evidence that both supports the claim, as well as any evidence that might undermine it.


done_all 5.3 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 5.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

I am satisfied that all claims are treated equally, using the same standards no matter who made the claim.


done_all 5.4 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 5.5
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

Based on a random assessment of published fact-checks, I am satisfied that, where possible, FaxctCheckNI makes an attempt to contact whoever made the claim to seek supporting evidence.


done_all 5.5 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 5.6
Proof you meet criteria
Please describe how you encourage users to send in claims to check, while making it clear what readers can legitimately expect will be fact-checked and what isn’t fact-checkable. Include links where appropriate. If you do not allow this, explain why.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI response:

FactCheckNI’s process of claim selection is explained in both our fact-checking process webpage and on our online claim submission form:

https://factcheckni.org/about/process/

https://factcheckni.org/claims

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI’s process of claim selection is explained in both it fact-checking process webpage (https://bit.ly/3hXJDpm) and in its online claim submission form: https://bit.ly/3AQBoSu 


done_all 5.6 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Section 6: A commitment to an Open & Honest Corrections Policy

To be compliant on corrections policy, applicants must meet these five criteria

  • 6.1 The applicant has a corrections or complaints policy that is easily visible and accessible on the organization’s website or frequently referenced in broadcasts.
  • 6.2 The policy sets out clear definitions of what it does and does not cover, how major mistakes, especially those requiring revised conclusions of a fact check, are handled, and the fact that some complaints may justify no response. This policy is adhered to scrupulously.
  • 6.3 Where credible evidence is provided that the applicant has made a mistake worthy of correction, the applicant makes a correction openly and transparently, seeking as far as possible to ensure that users of the original see the correction and the corrected version.
  • 6.4 The applicant, if an existing signatory, should either on its corrections/complaints page or on the page where it declares itself an IFCN signatory inform users that if they believe the signatory is violating the IFCN Code, they may inform the IFCN, with a link to the IFCN site.
  • 6.5 If the applicant is the fact-checking unit of a media company, it is a requirement of signatory status that the parent media company has and adheres to an open and honest corrections policy.

Criteria 6.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a link to where you publish on your website your corrections or complaints policy. If you are primarily a broadcaster, please provide evidence you frequently reference your corrections policy in broadcasts.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago

FactCheckNI response:

FactCheckNI’s correction policy is explained online: https://factcheckni.org/about/process/

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

"Our process is rigorous and aims to ensure that our published work is as accurate as possible. But we recognise that mistakes can happen. Post-publication of any FactCheckNI article, we welcome receiving further evidence, whether it refutes or validates our conclusion. New evidence will be promptly considered by the editorial team. Where appropriate, we will strive to update an article within 24 hours. We are transparent about updates and signpost this in any amended article (often noting that there has been an update near the start, with a description of the change within the main body of the text or at the end).

"When we publish significant amendments or updates to FactCheckNI articles on our website (other than correcting spelling mistakes or rewording a phrase for clarity), we also republish notifications on our social media channels, with a clear labelling of the updated status of the fact-checked article if the verdict has changed."

See "Corrections":  


done_all 6.1 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 6.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the corrections policy to verify it meets critera. No additional information needed.

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

I am satisfied that FactCheckNI's corrections policy meets the required IFCN criteria


done_all 6.2 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 6.3
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a short statement about how the policy was adhered to over the previous year (or six months if this is the first application) including evidence of two examples of the responses provided by the applicant to a correction request over the previous year. Where no correction request has been made in the previous year, you must state this in your application, which will be publicly available in the assessment if your application is successful.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
In the past year, FactCheckNI published no corrections to any fact-check article.
Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

Fact-Check NI says in its application that it has not published any corrections during the period under review for this assessment.


done_all 6.3 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 6.4
Proof you meet criteria
If you are an existing signatory, please provide a link to show where on your site you inform users that if they believe you are violating the IFCN Code, they may inform the IFCN of this, with a link to the complaints page on the IFCN site.

FactCheckNI
17-Aug-2022 (2 years ago) Updated: 1 year ago
We inform users that they can submit any belief of a violation, by FactCheckNI, of the Code of Principles to IFCN, on our Code of Principles webpage:  

https://factcheckni.org/about-us/code-of-principles/

Raymond Joseph Assessor
21-Nov-2022 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago

In its Code of Principles - see https://bit.ly/3u4pYqx FactCheckNI says: "The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) is a forum for fact-checkers worldwide. IFCN publishes a Code of Principles, which is a series of commitments that organisations abide by to promote excellence in fact-checking.

FactCheckNI is a verified signatory of the code. We display a badge of verification on our homepage and throughout our website. You can read our applications and assessments of our compliance on the IFCN Code of Principles website.

If you wish to report a violation of the code by FactCheckNI to the IFCN, you can do so here. (The word here hyperlinks to IFCN's "Complaints Policy" page where people can submit their complaints. https://bit.ly/2S4TNok 


done_all 6.4 marked as Compliant by Raymond Joseph.

Criteria 6.5
Proof you meet criteria
If you are the fact-checking unit of a media company, please provide a link to the parent media company’s honest and open corrections policy and provide evidence that it adheres to this.