Organization: Doğrula
Applicant: Yunus Çağlar
Assessor: Sarphan Uzunoğlu
Background
In the rapidly evolving media landscape of Turkey, where information and misinformation can spread with equal velocity, the role of fact-checking organizations becomes critically important. In this context, the emergence of Doğrula as a fact-checking entity is not just an addition to the existing array of information verification sources, but a substantive enhancement to the quality and integrity of information being disseminated to the public.
Upon a meticulous and thorough review, it was observed that Doğrula's methodologies and operational tactics are perfectly aligned with the stringent criteria of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). This alignment is critical, as the IFCN is a globally recognized body that sets the highest standards for fact-checking organizations, ensuring they operate in an impartial, transparent, and accurate manner. Doğrula's unwavering commitment to these principles is evident in their daily operations and output, which consistently display a balanced and analytical approach to each subject they tackle.
The presence of two established fact-checking organizations from Turkey within the IFCN network prior to Doğrula's inception might have suggested a well-covered field. However, Doğrula has not only found its rightful place but has also significantly broadened the scope and impact of fact-checking in the region. They have brought a fresh perspective and a rigorous analytical approach to the examination of claims and assertions made within the public sphere.
Doğrula's approach to fact-checking is characterized by its inclusiveness and its emphasis on providing a comprehensive view of the subjects it investigates. This has introduced a new level of informational richness and a more nuanced understanding of the issues at hand. Moreover, by fostering a competitive environment, Doğrula has indirectly propelled other organizations to elevate their standards and to adopt more innovative fact-checking techniques.
In light of the extensive evaluation, it is clear that Doğrula not only meets but in many aspects exceeds the expectations set by the IFCN. The organization has proven to be a pivotal force in the advancement of media integrity and reliability in Turkey. Their diligence in enhancing the fact-checking process reflects a larger commitment to the greater good of ensuring a well-informed society. No discrepancies were found in their adherence to the IFCN standards, and their operational practices have been commendable. Therefore, the decision statement affirming Doğrula's success and importance in Turkey's information sphere stands firmly on a foundation of verified excellence.
Assessment Conclusion
Doğrula has established itself as a significant and efficacious entity within the information landscape of Turkey through its dedicated fact-checking efforts. In an extensive assessment of their operations against the criteria set forth by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), there was not a single instance wherein Doğrula's practices were found to be at odds with these standards. This underscores their commendable compliance with the rigorous benchmarks of fact-checking excellence and their contribution to fostering an informed public discourse. Despite the presence of two other fact-checking outlets from Turkey within the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) prior to the advent of Doğrula, their entry into the arena has notably enriched the field. Doğrula has introduced a healthy competitive dynamic and has contributed to the diversity and depth of information available in the fact-checking ecosystem. Their efforts have augmented the collective endeavor to enhance the quality and accessibility of verified information for the public.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu assesses application as Compliant
A short summary in native publishing language
Doğrula, Türkiye'nin bilgi alanında doğrulama çabalarıyla önemli ve başarılı bir aktör olarak kendini kanıtlamıştır. Uluslararası Doğruluk Kontrol Ağı (IFCN) tarafından belirlenen kriterlere karşı yapılan bu değerlendirmede, Doğrula'nın uygulamalarının bu standartlarla çeliştiğine dair tek bir örnek bile gözlemlenmemiştir. Bu durum, onların doğrulama konusunda belirlenen kriterlere uyumlarını ve bilgi eksikliği çekilmeyen kamusal tartışmayı teşvik etmedeki katkılarını göz önüne sermektedir. IFCN'e Türkiye'den Doğrula'dan önce iki gerçek doğrulama kuruluşunun dahil olmasına rağmen, Doğrula'nın alana katılması alanı zenginleştirdi. Doğrula, sağlıklı bir rekabet dinamiği getirdi ve gerçek doğrulama ekosistemindeki bilgi çeşitliliğine ve derinliğine katkıda bulundu. Çabaları, doğrulanmış bilgilere kamuoyunun erişimini ve kalitesini artırma yolundaki kolektif çabayı güçlendirdi.
Section 1: Eligibility to be a signatory
To be eligible to be a signatory, applicants must meet these six criteria
- 1.1 The applicant is a legally registered organization, or a distinct team or unit within a legally registered organization, and details of this are easily found on its website.
- 1.2 The team, unit or organization is set up exclusively for the purpose of fact-checking.
- 1.3 The applicant has published an average of at least one fact check a week over the course of the six months prior to the date of application. For applicants from countries with at least 5 or more verified signatories need to have at least a fact check a week over the twelve months of publishing track. Consult to factchecknet@poynter.org for confirmation.
- 1.4 On average, at least 75% of the applicant’s fact checks focus on claims related to issues that, in the view of the IFCN, relate to or could have an impact on the welfare or well-being of individuals, the general public or society.
- 1.5 The applicant’s editorial output is not, in the view of the IFCN, controlled by the state, a political party or politician.
- 1.6 If the organization receives funding from local or foreign state or political sources, it provides a statement on its site setting out to the satisfaction of the IFCN, how it ensures its funders do not influence the findings of its reports.
Criteria 1.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please explain where on your website you set out information about your organization’s legal status and how this complies with criteria. Attach a link to the relevant page of your website.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Dogrula.org is an organization of the Digital Society Research Association. Our official status is association.
https://www.dogrula.org/biz-kimiz/
https://dijitaltoplumarastirmalari.org
*Since cannot add files on the site due to technical problems, we send the necessary documents embedded in the below Google Drive link.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1S7unfEc8n5pCOo474-F7oFDBCYY_wi36?usp=sharing
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Based on the information available, Doğrula is confirmed to be performing under a legally registered organization, and details about its registration and operations can be easily accessed on its official website.
done_all 1.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.2
Proof you meet criteria
Please answer the following questions – (see notes in Guidelines for Application on how to answer)
1. When and why was your fact-checking operation started?
2. How many people work or volunteer in the organization and what are their roles?
3. What different activities does your organization carry out?
4. What are the goals of your fact-checking operation over the coming year?
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago)
1. Our fact-checking operation started in April 2021. Our motivation to start is to
establish a reliable verification organization in Turkey that is an IFCN signatory. We think there is a great need for independent verifiers in Turkey.
2. Our organization employs a total of 15 people. 5 editors, 1 external stakeholder relations executive, 1 social media editor, 2 administrative and finance staff, 4 video and graphics editors, 1 editorial executive, and 1 manager. The relevant link is below.
https://www.dogrula.org/ekibimiz/
3. In addition to Dogrula.org, our organization is also working on the content of dogruveri.com, which we took over to develop further.
4. We strive to spread a worldview based on truth. Our biggest enemy is destructive ignorance. In this sense, we want to make a web plugin with tools, a plugin with quizzes on global trends and systematic misconceptions. We will identify systematic misconceptions about important global trends and rates and develop easy-to-understand teaching materials to free people from these misconceptions. We will focus on migration, climate crisis, history, water, global hunger, and international conflicts.
On the other hand, we want to strengthen our contacts and collaborations with global channels and platforms such as META, TikTok, and Google.
In the previous application, we mentioned our ambitions to broadcast in Kurdish and Arabic next year. With the help of IFCN and Google Build funding, we have taken the first step to publish in English and Arabic. In the Q4 2023, we will start publishing in 2 foreign languages on our website. We had to postpone the Kurdish language for now, and instead we added English.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago)
Details provided by the organization in line with questions asked, confirm the team, unit or organization is set up exclusively for the purpose of fact-checking.
done_all 1.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.3
Proof you meet criteria
- The applicant has published an average of at least one fact check a week over the course of the six months prior to the date of application.
- For applicants from countries with at least 5 or more verified signatories need to have at least a fact check a week over the twelve months of publishing track.
- Consult to factchecknet@poynter.org for confirmation.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
We publish several fact-checks a week. Along with the frequency and number depending on the activity, we have fact-checked 226 claims in the last 6 months. You can find our publications in the link below.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago)
The frequency of fact-checks and the rate of falling within the public interest is satisfactory and in line with IFCN's requirements.
done_all 1.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous three months. No additional information required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
I can confirm that at least 75% of the Doğrula's fact-checking endeavors are centered on claims that pertain to issues which, in the perspective of the IFCN, are directly associated with or have the potential to influence the welfare or well-being of individuals, the general public, or society at large.
done_all 1.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please explain any commercial, financial and/or institutional relationship your organization has to the state, politicians or political parties in the country or countries you cover. Also explain funding or support received from foreign as well as local state or political actors over the previous financial year.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Dogrula.org has no financial or institutional ties or cooperation with the state or political actors.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğrula has no financial or institutional relationship with Turkish politicians, political parties, or the state itself. The association, apparently, doesn't get any financial support from foreign actors either.
done_all 1.5 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.6
Proof you meet criteria
If you confirmed the organization receives funding from local or foreign state or political sources, provide a link to where on your website you set out how you ensure the editorial independence of your work.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Dogrula.org has no financial or institutional ties or cooperation with the state or political actors. Below is the link to our principles of funding and mentioned about our editorial independence principles:
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
The applicant has no financial or institutional ties or cooperation. So it is compliant.
done_all 1.6 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 2: A commitment to Non-partisanship and Fairness
To be compliant on nonpartisanship and fairness, applicants must meet these five criteria
- 2.1 The applicant fact-checks using the same high standards of evidence and judgement for equivalent claims regardless of who made the claim.
- 2.2 The applicant does not unduly concentrate its fact-checking on any one side, considers the reach and importance of claims it selects to check and publishes a short statement on its website to set out how it selects claims to check.
- 2.3 The applicant discloses in its fact checks relevant interests of the sources it quotes where the reader might reasonably conclude those interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided. It also discloses in its fact checks any commercial or other such relationships it has that a member of the public might reasonably conclude could influence the findings of the fact check.
- 2.4 The applicant is not as an organization affiliated with nor declares or shows support for any party, any politician or political candidate, nor does it advocate for or against any policy positions on any issues save for transparency and accuracy in public debate.
- 2.5 The applicant sets out its policy on non-partisanship for staff on its site. Save for the issues of accuracy and transparency, the applicant’s staff do not get involved in advocacy or publicise their views on policy issues the organization might fact check in such a way as might lead a reasonable member of the public to see the organization’s work as biased.
Criteria 2.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please share links to 10 fact checks published over the past year that you believe demonstrate your non-partisanship.
Please briefly explain how the fact checks selected show that (I) you use the same high standards of evidence for equivalent claims, (II) follow the same essential process for every fact check and (III) let the evidence dictate your conclusions.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
1- Analysis of the fictional video that President Erdoğan showed at his rally:
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/millet-ittifakinin-haydi-temali-tanitim-filminde-murat-karayilanin-yer-aldigi-iddiasi/
2- A statement by the leader of the main opposition party that we found to be wrong:
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/meclis-tutanaklarinda-sadece-kurtce-ifadeler-icin-bilinmeyen-dil-ibaresinin-yer-aldigi-iddiasi/
3- Analysis of misinformation targeting the Green Left Party.
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/yesil-sol-partinin-secim-sarkisinda-turk-askerini-havaya-ucurduk-ifadesinin-gectigi-iddiasi/
4- MHP leader Devlet Bahçeli's allegedly topical remarks:
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/devlet-bahcelinin-cumhurbaskani-erdogan-hakkinda-soyledigi-sozler-guncel-mi/
5- Verification analysis of an allegation that carries the message that the DEVA Party ignores religious values
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/deva-partisinin-ramazanda-lokum-dagittigi-iddiasi/
6- An analysis of a claim against IYI Party Leader Meral Akşener's party:
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/aksenerin-2018-cumhurbaskanligi-secimlerine-10-gun-kala-miting-yapmadigi-iddiasi/
7- An allegation against Turkish Trade Minister Mehmet Muş:
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/video-bakan-musun-karsisindaki-vatandasi-dinlemedigini-mi-gosteriyor/
8- An analysis of allegations against the ruling party:
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/ak-partinin-secim-aracinda-arapca-sarki-caldigi-iddiasi/
9- An allegation against then Interior Minister Süleyman Soylu:
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/fotograftaki-kisinin-icisleri-bakani-suleyman-soylu-oldugu-iddiasi/
10- An example of asymmetric propaganda targeting CHP Leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu
https://www.dogrula.org/dogrulamalar/reklam-panosunda-yer-alan-kemal-kilicdaroglunun-secim-afisi-gercek-mi/
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
In our comprehensive assessment of Doğrula's fact-checking processes, as demonstrated by the ten samples provided, I can affirm that Doğrula maintains consistent and high standards of evidence and judgement.
Their rigorous analysis encompasses a diverse range of subjects, including various political parties and leaders. Regardless of the origin or the individual making the claim, Doğrula's approach ensures that each fact-check adheres to a uniform procedure, letting the evidence guide their conclusions without bias.
Their commitment to non-partisanship and objective reporting is evident in their consistent methodology and balanced selection of topics across the political spectrum.
done_all 2.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 2.2
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to a place on your website where you explain how you select claims to check, explaining how you ensure you do not unduly concentrate your fact-checking on any one side, and how you consider the reach and importance of the claims you select to check.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
The relevant link is below.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğrula, in its fact-checking endeavors, does not disproportionately focus on any single side or entity. Their selection process for claims is meticulous, taking into account the reach and significance of each claim.
I think this ensures fairness, balance, and a commitment to providing the public with accurate and unbiased information.
done_all 2.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 2.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous year. No additional information required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğrula firmly commits to the disclosure of relevant interests of the sources it quotes if available. Recognizing the critical eye with which the public views potential conflicts of interest, Doğrula proactively discloses any such connections that might reasonably be construed to influence its findings. My observations confirm that Doğrula is commitment to these principles listed in criteria.
done_all 2.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 2.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous year. No additional information required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğrula operates as a nonpartisan and independent fact-checking organization, dedicated solely to promoting transparency and accuracy in public discourse. It does not support or oppose any political parties, politicians, or policy positions. While there were initial challenges related to the domain's previous ownership during their first application, these have been transparently addressed. Since then, Doğrula has upheld its commitment to unbiased and factual reporting, with no problematic practices observed.
done_all 2.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 2.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to a place on your website where you publish a statement setting out your policy on non-partisanship for staff and how it ensures the organization meets this criteria.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Below are the links related to our ethical standards, fundamental principles, and organizational processes.
https://www.dogrula.org/etik-standartlar/
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
There is a policy publicly available and the content is very satisfactory.
done_all 2.5 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 3: A commitment to Standards and Transparency of Sources
To be compliant on sources, applicants must meet these four criteria
- 3.1 The applicant identifies the source of all significant evidence used in their fact checks, providing relevant links where the source is available online, in such a way that users can replicate their work if they wish. In cases where identifying the source would compromise the source’s personal security, the applicant provides as much detail as compatible with the source’s safety.
- 3.2 The applicant uses the best available primary, not secondary, sources of evidence wherever suitable primary sources are available. Where suitable primary sources are not available, the applicant explains the use of a secondary source.
- 3.3 The applicant checks all key elements of claims against more than one named source of evidence save where the one source is the only source relevant on the topic.
- 3.4 The applicant identifies in its fact checks the relevant interests of the sources it uses where the reader might reasonably conclude those interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided.
Criteria 3.1
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğrula ensures that every significant piece of evidence used in its fact checks is sourced transparently. Whenever possible, they provide direct links to the original sources online, enabling users to verify and replicate Doğrula's fact-checking processes themselves.
In instances where revealing a source's identity could endanger their safety, Doğrula carefully balances the need for transparency with the responsibility to protect individuals, providing as much information as safely possible. This approach allows Doğrula to maintain a high standard of accountability while respecting the security of its sources. Accessing online sources often poses methodological and technical challenges, but Doğrula has effectively navigated these complexities to provide reliable information.
done_all 3.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 3.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğrula faithfully adheres to the hierarchy of information in their methodology, prioritizing primary sources of evidence whenever possible. If primary sources aren't available, they clearly explain why they're using secondary sources instead.
done_all 3.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 3.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğrula verifies all key aspects of claims with multiple named sources, except in cases where there is only one relevant source on the topic.
done_all 3.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 3.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğrula diligently cross-checks every key detail of the claims they investigate with several named sources, demonstrating a robust commitment to multi-source verification. This practice is particularly challenging in a complex information landscape like Turkey's, where obtaining multiple reliable sources can be difficult. The persistent effort Doğrula puts into this meticulous process, despite such challenges, is truly commendable and reflects their dedication to thorough and accurate fact-checking.
done_all 3.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 4: A commitment to Transparency of Funding & Organization
To be compliant on funding and organization, applicants must meet these five criteria
- 4.1 Applicants that are independent organizations have a page on their website detailing each source of funding accounting for 5% or more of total revenue for its previous financial year. This page also sets out the legal form in which the organization is registered (e.g. as a non-profit, as a company etc).
- 4.2 Applicants that are the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization make a statement on ownership.
- 4.3 A statement on the applicant’s website sets out the applicant’s organizational structure and makes clear how and by whom editorial control is exercised.
- 4.4 A page on the applicant’s website details the professional biography of all those who, according to the organizational structure and play a significant part in its editorial output.
- 4.5 The applicant provides easy means on its website and/or via social media for users to communicate with the editorial team.
Criteria 4.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please confirm whether you are an ‘independent organization’
or ‘the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization’ and share proof of this organizational status.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Dogrula.org is an organization of the Digital Society Research Association (Dijital Toplum Araştırmaları Derneği). Our official status is association.
https://www.dogrula.org/biz-kimiz/
https://dijitaltoplumarastirmalari.org
*Since cannot add files on the site due to technical problems, we send the necessary documents embedded in the below Google Drive link.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1S7unfEc8n5pCOo474-F7oFDBCYY_wi36?usp=sharing
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
The information they provided proves that they are a registered NGO and and independent organization.
done_all 4.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 4.2
Proof you meet criteria
If your organization is an “independent organization”, please share a link to the page on your website where you detail your funding and indicate the legal form in which the organization is registered (e.g. as a non-profit, as a company etc).
If your organization is “the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization”, please share a link to the statement on your website about your ownership.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
The relevant link is below.
https://www.dogrula.org/finansal-kaynaklar/
*Since cannot add files on the site due to technical problems, we send the necessary documents embedded in the below Google Drive link.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1UPWJRhPOPWuJsToTMRIZAZ7wug4Qy1qF?usp=sharing
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
They have provided very detailed information about their sources of funding. https://www.dogrula.org/finansal-kaynaklar/ page sets out all relevant details.
done_all 4.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 4.3
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you set out your organizational structure, making clear how and by whom editorial control is exercised.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
The sections linked provide sufficient information about their organizational structure, making clear how and by whom editorial control is exercised.
done_all 4.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 4.4
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you set out the professional biographies of those who play a significant part in your organization’s editorial output.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
The relevant link is below.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Team page is detailed enough and meets the criterion.
done_all 4.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 4.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you encourage users to communicate with your editorial team.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
On our website, users can reach our key team members via email and other social media accounts: https://www.dogrula.org/ekibimiz/
In addition, we encourage our users to use our WhatsApp, Telegram, and Instagram channels to report their claims, suspicious activities, and other feedback. Users can also get in touch with us through our contact page: https://www.dogrula.org/bize-ulasin/
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
They have an active and functional contact page and their staff's contacts are publicly available too.
done_all 4.5 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 5: A commitment to Standards and Transparency of Methodology
To be compliant on methodology, applicants must meet these six criteria
- 5.1 The applicant publishes on its website a statement about the methodology it uses to select, research, write and publish its fact checks.
- 5.2 The applicant selects claims to check based primarily on the reach and importance of the claims, and where possible explains the reason for choosing the claim to check.
- 5.3 The applicant sets out in its fact checks relevant evidence that appears to support the claim as well as relevant evidence that appears to undermine it.
- 5.4 The applicant in its fact checks assesses the merits of the evidence found using the same high standards applied to evidence on equivalent claims, regardless of who made the claim.
- 5.5 The applicant seeks where possible to contact those who made the claim to seek supporting evidence, noting that (I) this is often not possible with online claims, (II) if the person who makes the claim fails to reply in a timely way this should not impede the fact check, (III) if a speaker adds caveats to the claim, the fact-checker should be free to continue with checking the original claim, (IV) fact-checkers may not wish to contact the person who made the claim for safety or other legitimate reasons.
- 5.6 The applicant encourages users to send in claims to check, while making it clear what readers can legitimately expect will be fact-checked and what isn’t fact-checkable.
Criteria 5.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a link to the statement on your website that explains the methodology you use to select, research, write and publish your fact checks.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
The relevant link is below.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Their methodology is well explained on their website in a way that any regular citizen may understand. It is also easy to access as expected.
done_all 5.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Upon rigorous evaluation of a randomized sample of the applicant's fact-checking records, it is evident that the selection of claims for verification is predominantly influenced by the breadth of dissemination and the significance of the assertions in question. Furthermore, where feasible, the applicant elucidates the rationale behind the selection of specific claims, adhering to the prescribed criteria.
done_all 5.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Doğrula meticulously presents in its fact-checking reports pertinent evidence that seems to substantiate the claim alongside evidence that potentially contradicts it, ensuring a balanced and comprehensive analysis. I've found no evidence that contradicts to this criterion.
done_all 5.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Doğrula adheres to a stringent protocol in its fact-checking endeavors, ensuring that the evaluation of evidence is not influenced by the stature or identity of the individual or entity making the claim. Each piece of evidence, whether it appears to validate or negate the claim under scrutiny, is subjected to a thorough appraisal. This appraisal is conducted with unwavering adherence to established high standards that Doğrula consistently applies across all fact checks. Such a methodical approach guarantees that each claim is afforded an equitable assessment, reflecting Doğrula’s commitment to fairness and accuracy in the verification of information.
done_all 5.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.5
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
Doğrula endeavors to contact the originators of claims whenever feasible, aiming to obtain corroborative evidence directly from the source. This practice, however, often encounters practical limitations, especially with claims that emerge online, where the trail to the original claimant can be obscure or inaccessible. I
t is acknowledged that a prompt response from the claimant is not always possible, and the absence of such should not deter the fact-checking procedure. The applicant is also cognizant that claimants may introduce qualifications to their statements; nevertheless, the fact-checker reserves the right to assess the claim as originally presented. Moreover, there are circumstances under which the fact-checkers may prudently choose not to engage with the claimant, whether due to concerns for safety or other justified reasons. Throughout the evaluation of the applicant's practices within the sampled checks, no deviations from these principles were observed, affirming their adherence to the stated protocols.
done_all 5.5 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.6
Proof you meet criteria
Please describe how you encourage users to send in claims to check, while making it clear what readers can legitimately expect will be fact-checked and what isn’t fact-checkable. Include links where appropriate. If you do not allow this, explain why.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
We spur our followers to report suspicious content to WhatsApp, Telegram, the website form, and ihbar@dogrula.org e-mail address. We receive the most feedback through the Instagram direct message channel. Our followers can see what is verifiable from the claim selection criteria. On the other hand, we publish posts to encourage feedback during crisis, election, and disaster periods.
https://www.dogrula.org/bize-ulasin/
https://twitter.com/dogrulaorg/status/1622500138135523328
https://twitter.com/dogrulaorg/status/1655919924278067206
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CwiHid4Pecl/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Their statement here and daily practices confirm that they encourage users to send claims and understand the criteria regarding what is/isn't fact-checkable.
done_all 5.6 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 6: A commitment to an Open & Honest Corrections Policy
To be compliant on corrections policy, applicants must meet these five criteria
- 6.1 The applicant has a corrections or complaints policy that is easily visible and accessible on the organization’s website or frequently referenced in broadcasts.
- 6.2 The policy sets out clear definitions of what it does and does not cover, how major mistakes, especially those requiring revised conclusions of a fact check, are handled, and the fact that some complaints may justify no response. This policy is adhered to scrupulously.
- 6.3 Where credible evidence is provided that the applicant has made a mistake worthy of correction, the applicant makes a correction openly and transparently, seeking as far as possible to ensure that users of the original see the correction and the corrected version.
- 6.4 The applicant, if an existing signatory, should either on its corrections/complaints page or on the page where it declares itself an IFCN signatory inform users that if they believe the signatory is violating the IFCN Code, they may inform the IFCN, with a link to the IFCN site.
- 6.5 If the applicant is the fact-checking unit of a media company, it is a requirement of signatory status that the parent media company has and adheres to an open and honest corrections policy.
Criteria 6.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a link to where you publish on your website your corrections or complaints policy. If you are primarily a broadcaster, please provide evidence you frequently reference your corrections policy in broadcasts.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
https://www.dogrula.org/politikalarimiz/
Details of our correction policy can be found on Our Policies page above. On the other hand, we also share links to the content that we have corrected or updated in this area. On the right side of the article page, updates and corrections to that content are always marked.
https://www.dogrula.org/bize-ulasin/
In the contact form, there is an option "I object to a piece of content". The link "You can object to this content" within the article leads to the form.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
I can confirm that Doğrula has instituted a corrections or complaints policy which is not only prominently displayed but is also easily accessible on the organization's official website.
Additionally, this policy is frequently referenced in their contents, ensuring that their audience is well-informed and aware of the avenues available for addressing any concerns or discrepancies. This transparency underscores Doğrula's commitment to accountability and continuous improvement.
done_all 6.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 6.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the corrections policy to verify it meets critera. No additional information needed.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
They are very clear about what is fact-checked or not and how this decision process works. I see no problem about this criterion.
done_all 6.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 6.3
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a short statement about how the policy was adhered to over the previous year (or six months if this is the first application) including evidence of two examples of the responses provided by the applicant to a correction request over the previous year. Where no correction request has been made in the previous year, you must state this in your application, which will be publicly available in the assessment if your application is successful.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
During the year, we did not receive any correction requests through communication or local court channels. On the other hand, our other corrections did not change the conclusion that the content was incorrect and accurate. In this context, it can be considered as an update or additional information entry. However, these updates are shared with a link in the policies section of our website.
For any content published on Dogrula.org, correction requests and feedback can be made via the 'contact form' method. (Except for requests that force the principles of impartiality and objectivity to be abused) For feedback, the visitor must fill out the contact form in the 'About Us' section completely and clearly state the correction request or feedback. If the original publication in which the error was made is not editable, the correction is published in the same format and channel as the original.
If an error is material, i.e. fundamentally alters the results of the investigation or is a clear departure from the operation's methodology and policies, the correction note includes accurate information as well as an explanation of the circumstances that led to the error.
When new information is added to a publication, an update note in the same publication indicates this. Dogrula.org request review process takes place in 2 stages. Dogrula.org responds to correction or feedback forms within 15 days at the latest.
In this sense, we have 3 basic criteria.
First of all, we must protect our independence. For this reason, if the importance and courtesy we attach to feedback, opinions and suggestions are abused, and if our verification content is tried to be taken in ways that harm our principles, such feedback will not be answered.
Second, we need to balance the time we spend corresponding with people one-on-one with the time we spend serving the wider community.
Third, we want to make sure that we provide people with the most accurate information from the most powerful sources, so we don't hesitate to make any corrections that we think will make our content better quality.
https://www.dogrula.org/politikalarimiz/
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
They didn't provide any specific case that fits to the criteria since there were no correction requests from any channels. However, they explained how the process works and how the updates they made on stories were added to content and it is satisfactory in my end.
done_all 6.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 6.4
Proof you meet criteria
If you are an existing signatory, please provide a link to show where on your site you inform users that if they believe you are violating the IFCN Code, they may inform the IFCN of this, with a link to the complaints page on the IFCN site.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
https://www.dogrula.org/politikalarimiz/
At this link, there is an option to report to IFCN.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
There is no problem about this criterion.
done_all 6.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 6.5
Proof you meet criteria
If you are the fact-checking unit of a media company, please provide a link to the parent media company’s honest and open corrections policy and provide evidence that it adheres to this.
Doğrula
05-Sep-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Dogrula.org is not a fact-checking unit of any media company.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
02-Nov-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
They have a relevant statement publicly available.