Organization: Doğruluk Payı
Applicant: Batuhan Ersun
Assessor: Sarphan Uzunoğlu
Background
Doğruluk Payı has demonstrated a consistent and unwavering commitment to upholding the highest standards of fact-checking and transparency. Over the course of the review it was evident that they maintain a clear and transparent methodology for the selection, research, composition, and dissemination of their fact checks. This methodology is not only thorough but is also presented in a manner that ensures the audience can grasp the rigorous processes behind their work. Their approach to sourcing is meticulous, prioritizing primary sources and providing detailed explanations when secondary sources are utilized. They also make concerted efforts to contact claimants for evidence, ensuring a comprehensive review of each claim.
Given this comprehensive review and Doğruluk Payı's adherence to the rigorous standards set forth by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), the decision to accept their application to continue as an IFCN signatory is both logical and merited. Their practices and policies resonate with the ethos of unbiased and rigorous fact-checking, making them a valuable asset to the IFCN community, especially in the intricate media landscape of Turkey.
Assessment Conclusion
In conclusion, after review of Doğruluk Payı's practices, methodologies, and commitments, it is evident that they embody the gold standard of fact-checking. Their unwavering dedication to transparency, accuracy, and objectivity, especially in the complex media environment of Turkey, is commendable.
Their proactive engagement with the audience and adherence to the rigorous standards set forth by the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) underscores their exceptional caliber in this domain. It is with great confidence and affirmation that I endorse Doğruluk Payı's continued status as an esteemed IFCN signatory. Their contributions to the realm of fact-checking are invaluable and much-needed in today's information age.
Additionally, it's worth noting that Doğruluk Payı is not just any organization in the realm of fact-checking; it stands as a well-established entity with a robust corporate culture that is deeply rooted in principles of integrity and diligence. The trust and respect they've garnered over the years are palpable, with the public holding them in high regard. Their reputation is not merely a reflection of their rigorous fact-checking processes but also indicative of their consistent engagement with the community, their transparency in operations, and their unwavering commitment to truth and fairness.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu assesses application as Compliant
A short summary in native publishing language
Sonuç olarak, Doğruluk Payı'nın uygulamalarını, metodolojilerini ve IFCN sözleşmesi kapsamındaki taahütlerini inceledikten sonra, yaptıkları işin kalitesi ortadadır. Özellikle Türkiye'nin karmaşık medya ortamında şeffaflık, doğruluk ve objektifliğe olan sarsılmaz bağlılıkları takdire şayan.
İzleyicilerle proaktif etkileşimleri ve Uluslararası Doğruluk Kontrol Ağı (IFCN) tarafından belirlenen titiz standartlara bağlılıkları, bu alandaki istisnai kalibrelerinin altını çizmektedir. Doğruluk Payı'nın saygın bir IFCN imzacısı olarak devam eden statüsünü onaylamayı öneriyorum. Doğruluk kontrolü alanına yaptıkları katkılar paha biçilmezdir ve günümüz bilgi çağında çok ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.
Buna ek olarak, Doğruluk Payı'nın doğruluk kontrolü alanında herhangi bir kuruluş olmadığını belirtmekte fayda var; Doğruluk Payı, dürüstlük ve özen ilkelerine derinlemesine dayanan sağlam bir kurumsal kültüre sahip köklü bir kuruluş olarak duruyor.
Yıllar içinde kazandıkları güven ve saygı aşikâr ve kamuoyu onlara önemli bir saygı duyuyor. İtibarları yalnızca titiz doğruluk kontrol süreçlerinin bir yansıması değil, aynı zamanda toplumla olan tutarlı ilişkilerinin, faaliyetlerindeki şeffaflığın ve doğruluk ve adalete olan sarsılmaz bağlılıklarının da bir göstergesi olarak yorumlanabilir.
Section 1: Eligibility to be a signatory
To be eligible to be a signatory, applicants must meet these six criteria
- 1.1 The applicant is a legally registered organization, or a distinct team or unit within a legally registered organization, and details of this are easily found on its website.
- 1.2 The team, unit or organization is set up exclusively for the purpose of fact-checking.
- 1.3 The applicant has published an average of at least one fact check a week over the course of the six months prior to the date of application. For applicants from countries with at least 5 or more verified signatories need to have at least a fact check a week over the twelve months of publishing track. Consult to factchecknet@poynter.org for confirmation.
- 1.4 On average, at least 75% of the applicant’s fact checks focus on claims related to issues that, in the view of the IFCN, relate to or could have an impact on the welfare or well-being of individuals, the general public or society.
- 1.5 The applicant’s editorial output is not, in the view of the IFCN, controlled by the state, a political party or politician.
- 1.6 If the organization receives funding from local or foreign state or political sources, it provides a statement on its site setting out to the satisfaction of the IFCN, how it ensures its funders do not influence the findings of its reports.
Criteria 1.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please explain where on your website you set out information about your organization’s legal status and how this complies with criteria. Attach a link to the relevant page of your website.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago)
Doğruluk Payı is a project of the Izlemedeyiz Association, which was founded in 2014 and is officially registered as an NGO in Turkey. The activities of the Doğruluk Payı project are conducted under the umbrella of the association. The Doğruluk Payı brand is owned by Medusa Dijital Yayıncılık A.Ş., but the rights to its use are held by the İzlemedeyiz Derneği and İzlemedeyiz Derneği İktisadi İşletmesi.
The 'Hakkımızda (About Us)' section on the main page of the Doğruluk Payı website provides details about the project's development process and its organizational structure.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago)
They are a registered NGO and their status applies to IFCN's standards.
done_all 1.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.2
Proof you meet criteria
Please answer the following questions – (see notes in Guidelines for Application on how to answer)
1. When and why was your fact-checking operation started?
2. How many people work or volunteer in the organization and what are their roles?
3. What different activities does your organization carry out?
4. What are the goals of your fact-checking operation over the coming year?
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago)
When and why was your fact-checking operation started?
Doğruluk Payı embarked on its mission in June 2014 as Turkey's pioneering fact-checking platform, born as a project of the İzlemedeyiz Association. The primary objective of the Doğruluk Payı was to empower citizens to make well-informed decisions in the wake of the 2013 Gezi Protests, a period marked by heightened distrust in both the media and political institutions in Turkey.
How many people work or volunteer in the organization and what are their roles?
1 Executive Director (Responsible for project activity coordination)
1 Editor-in-Chief (Oversees content production, policies, and workflow)
1 Digital Coordinator (Manages social media coordination and design)
1 Graphic Designer (Handles social media design)
1 Reporter (Manages project activities and training programs)
3 Full-time Editors (Monitor social media platforms and assist in content production)
2 Part-time Writers (Engaged in fact-checking)
3 Volunteer Writers (Temporary contributors)
What different activities does your organization carry out?
Doğruluk Payı dedicates a substantial portion of its resources to fact-checking and prebunking. Additionally, it publishes informative articles, tracks government promises, creates videos, and organizes fact-checking workshops.
What are the goals of your fact-checking operation over the coming year?
Doğruluk Payı's objective is to make a meaningful contribution to fostering a more informed and media-savvy audience in Turkey. In essence, Doğruluk Payı seeks to influence behavior. To accomplish this mission, it strives to enhance both the quantity and caliber of its content while efficiently and swiftly reaching its target audience.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago)
Details provided by the organization in line with questions asked, confirm the team, unit or organization is set up exclusively for the purpose of fact-checking.
done_all 1.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.3
Proof you meet criteria
- The applicant has published an average of at least one fact check a week over the course of the six months prior to the date of application.
- For applicants from countries with at least 5 or more verified signatories need to have at least a fact check a week over the twelve months of publishing track.
- Consult to factchecknet@poynter.org for confirmation.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago)
Between March 1, 2023, and August 30, 2023, Doğruluk Payı released a total of 310 fact-checks on its website. The publication dates of these fact-checks, along with their categorization based on the IFCN-defined public interest categories, are provided in the annex. Notably, 81% of the fact-checks fall within the public interest category.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago)
The frequency of fact-checks and the rate of falling within the public interest is satisfactory and in line with IFCN's requirements.
done_all 1.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous three months. No additional information required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Based on the sample provided, I found nothing problematic about this criteria.
done_all 1.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please explain any commercial, financial and/or institutional relationship your organization has to the state, politicians or political parties in the country or countries you cover. Also explain funding or support received from foreign as well as local state or political actors over the previous financial year.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago)
Doğruluk Payı or Izlemedeyiz Association has no financial or institutional relationship with Turkish politicians, political parties, or the state itself. The association receives some financial yearly grants from the Swedish Consulate but it's not related to the fact-checking contents of Doğruluk Payı. That grant covers office costs such as cleaning, kitchen expenses and utilities.
You can find more information about the grants at: https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/sayfa/hakkimizda
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Upon a meticulous examination of the information provided on their official 'About' page, coupled with my extensive observations of both their corporate and individual online accounts, it becomes evident that there has been a consistent absence of any material or statements that could be construed as open endorsement or support for any political figure or party. This observation underscores their commitment to maintaining a neutral stance in the political landscape.
done_all 1.5 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 1.6
Proof you meet criteria
If you confirmed the organization receives funding from local or foreign state or political sources, provide a link to where on your website you set out how you ensure the editorial independence of your work.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Doğruluk Payı or Izlemedeyiz Association has no financial or institutional relationship with Turkish politicians, political parties, or the state itself. The association receives some financial yearly grants from the Swedish Consulate but it's not related to the fact-checking contents of Doğruluk Payı. That grant covers office costs such as cleaning, kitchen expenses and utilities.
You can find more information about our editorial policies at: https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/sayfa/metodoloji
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Their financial support has been limited solely to covering their fundamental operational expenses. Furthermore, the methodology they have adopted and implemented is designed with great precision to safeguard and uphold their autonomy and independence. This approach ensures that they remain unbiased and free from any external influences that might compromise their objectives.
done_all 1.6 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 2: A commitment to Non-partisanship and Fairness
To be compliant on nonpartisanship and fairness, applicants must meet these five criteria
- 2.1 The applicant fact-checks using the same high standards of evidence and judgement for equivalent claims regardless of who made the claim.
- 2.2 The applicant does not unduly concentrate its fact-checking on any one side, considers the reach and importance of claims it selects to check and publishes a short statement on its website to set out how it selects claims to check.
- 2.3 The applicant discloses in its fact checks relevant interests of the sources it quotes where the reader might reasonably conclude those interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided. It also discloses in its fact checks any commercial or other such relationships it has that a member of the public might reasonably conclude could influence the findings of the fact check.
- 2.4 The applicant is not as an organization affiliated with nor declares or shows support for any party, any politician or political candidate, nor does it advocate for or against any policy positions on any issues save for transparency and accuracy in public debate.
- 2.5 The applicant sets out its policy on non-partisanship for staff on its site. Save for the issues of accuracy and transparency, the applicant’s staff do not get involved in advocacy or publicise their views on policy issues the organization might fact check in such a way as might lead a reasonable member of the public to see the organization’s work as biased.
Criteria 2.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please share links to 10 fact checks published over the past year that you believe demonstrate your non-partisanship.
Please briefly explain how the fact checks selected show that (I) you use the same high standards of evidence for equivalent claims, (II) follow the same essential process for every fact check and (III) let the evidence dictate your conclusions.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
In the past year, Doğruluk Payı has conducted over 650 fact-checks on a wide range of topics. When assessing the prevailing themes within Turkey's information ecosystem, it becomes evident that misinformation tends to be disseminated primarily to either criticize or support the current government. Notably, these political dimensions are prominent in various subjects. Furthermore, in relation to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, posts tend to either criticize or favor Russia. Apart from these polarizing topics, misinformation has also been frequently shared regarding Syrian refugees, LGBTI+, and COVID-19.
Of the ten selected fact-checks, six demonstrate that we apply the same standard when scrutinizing claims from various perspectives, particularly on highly polarized issues. The remaining fact-checks underscore our commitment to a consistent fact-checking process, prioritizing evidence and impartiality over potential reactions to contentious subjects in Turkey.
Pro-government
Anti-government
https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/dogruluk-kontrolu/video-ak-parti-nin-batman-mitingini-mi-gosteriyor
Pro-Russia
https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/dogruluk-kontrolu/ukrayna-daki-savasta-vurulmus-bina-fotografi-sahte-mi
Anti-Russia
Syrian refugees
LGBTI-related issues
COVID-19
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Upon reviewing the ten chosen fact-checks, it is evident that a majority exemplify IFCN's consistent standard of scrutiny across varied viewpoints, especially on divisive topics. The rest emphasize our unwavering dedication to evidence-based, impartial analysis, even when addressing potentially controversial subjects within the Turkish context.
done_all 2.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 2.2
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to a place on your website where you explain how you select claims to check, explaining how you ensure you do not unduly concentrate your fact-checking on any one side, and how you consider the reach and importance of the claims you select to check.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Doğruluk Payı editors actively monitor social media platforms to identify suspicious posts and assemble a pool of content for fact-checking. They utilize agenda-scanning tools like Google Trends, Meta Factchecking Product, and Newswhip as part of this monitoring process. Additionally, any images, posts, or content reported as suspicious by social media users are included in this pool.
Within this pool of suspicious posts, the team initially assesses whether each post can be fact-checked using impartial and objective sources. Subsequently, the posts are prioritized based on two key factors: their frequency of circulation and their potential to gain traction on social media.
The detailed process of how this works is clearly outlined in the 'Methodology' section, easily accessible from the main page of Doğruluk Payı.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğruluk Payı has provided a link directing to a section on their website where they elucidate the methodology behind their selection of claims for verification.
done_all 2.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 2.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous year. No additional information required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
It is visible that Doğruluk Payı, in its commitment to transparency and accuracy, systematically discloses the pertinent interests of the sources it cites within its fact checks.
This is particularly the case when there exists a reasonable premise for readers to deduce that such interests might bear an influence on the veracity of the evidence presented. Moreover, Doğruluk Payı also consistently reveals any commercial or analogous associations it might have, especially when such relationships could be reasonably perceived by the public as potential influences on the conclusions drawn in the fact-checking process. This practice underscores their dedication to maintaining the highest standards of objectivity and trustworthiness.
In a country like Turkey, with its intricate socio-political landscape and diverse media ecosystem, adhering unwaveringly to rigorous fact-checking standards and maintaining complete transparency can be an exceptionally challenging endeavor. The confluence of political dynamics, societal expectations, and the myriad of information sources can often make the task of fact-checking both intricate and sensitive. Upholding these standards requires not only a deep commitment to the truth but also a resilience to navigate potential pressures and challenges that might arise. Despite these complexities, it is imperative for organizations like Doğruluk Payı to remain steadfast in their mission, ensuring that the public is equipped with accurate and unbiased information. They have done well this year.
done_all 2.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 2.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will assess compliance through a review of the fact checks published over the previous year. No additional information required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
They don't side with any political party, politician, or candidate. As an organization, Doğruluk Payı does not maintain any affiliations with, nor does it declare or manifest support for, any political party, politician, or political candidate. Moreover, it refrains from advocating for or against any specific policy positions on varied issues.
done_all 2.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 2.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to a place on your website where you publish a statement setting out your policy on non-partisanship for staff and how it ensures the organization meets this criteria.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Doğruluk Payı’s editorial policy can be found at
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğruluk Payı has explicitly outlined its policy on non-partisanship for its staff on its official website.
Apart from their unwavering commitment to accuracy and transparency, it is essential to note that the staff of Doğruluk Payı refrains from engaging in any form of advocacy or publicizing their individual perspectives on policy matters.
done_all 2.5 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 3: A commitment to Standards and Transparency of Sources
To be compliant on sources, applicants must meet these four criteria
- 3.1 The applicant identifies the source of all significant evidence used in their fact checks, providing relevant links where the source is available online, in such a way that users can replicate their work if they wish. In cases where identifying the source would compromise the source’s personal security, the applicant provides as much detail as compatible with the source’s safety.
- 3.2 The applicant uses the best available primary, not secondary, sources of evidence wherever suitable primary sources are available. Where suitable primary sources are not available, the applicant explains the use of a secondary source.
- 3.3 The applicant checks all key elements of claims against more than one named source of evidence save where the one source is the only source relevant on the topic.
- 3.4 The applicant identifies in its fact checks the relevant interests of the sources it uses where the reader might reasonably conclude those interests could influence the accuracy of the evidence provided.
Criteria 3.1
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğruluk Payı demonstrates a commendable commitment to transparency in their fact-checking process. It is confirmed that they systematically identify the origins of all significant evidence utilized in their fact checks. Wherever the source is accessible online, relevant links are diligently provided, facilitating users in replicating and verifying their work independently. Based on the samples observed, there is no instance where Doğruluk Payı has overlooked a crucial reference or omitted a pivotal source, underscoring their thoroughness and dedication to accuracy.
done_all 3.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 3.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğruluk Payı adheres to a stringent standard of evidence sourcing. They prioritize the use of the most reliable primary sources of evidence whenever such sources are accessible. In instances where suitable primary sources are not available, Doğruluk Payı takes the conscientious step of elucidating their rationale for resorting to secondary sources.
Their practice this year exemplified their commitment to transparency and ensuring the highest quality of information in their fact-checking endeavors.
I've not observed any negative case related to this criterion.
done_all 3.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 3.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 10 months ago
I can confirm that there hasn't been an instance where the DP editors failed to cross-check all pivotal elements of claims against multiple named sources of evidence. This holds true except in cases where a singular source is the sole relevant authority on the topic in question. This observation underscores the applicant's meticulous approach to ensuring comprehensive and multi-faceted fact-checking.
done_all 3.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 3.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the applicant’s use of sources in a randomised sample of its fact checks to assess compliance. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
I can affirmatively state that Doğruluk Payı's editors have consistently identified and disclosed the pertinent interests of the sources they cite within their fact checks. This is especially the case when there's a reasonable assumption that such interests might impact the veracity of the evidence presented. Given the multifaceted and intricate political terrain of Turkey, this task is undoubtedly challenging. However, Doğruluk Payı has demonstrated commendable diligence and precision in this regard, ensuring that their fact-checking remains both transparent and reliable in such a complex environment.
done_all 3.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 4: A commitment to Transparency of Funding & Organization
To be compliant on funding and organization, applicants must meet these five criteria
- 4.1 Applicants that are independent organizations have a page on their website detailing each source of funding accounting for 5% or more of total revenue for its previous financial year. This page also sets out the legal form in which the organization is registered (e.g. as a non-profit, as a company etc).
- 4.2 Applicants that are the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization make a statement on ownership.
- 4.3 A statement on the applicant’s website sets out the applicant’s organizational structure and makes clear how and by whom editorial control is exercised.
- 4.4 A page on the applicant’s website details the professional biography of all those who, according to the organizational structure and play a significant part in its editorial output.
- 4.5 The applicant provides easy means on its website and/or via social media for users to communicate with the editorial team.
Criteria 4.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please confirm whether you are an ‘independent organization’
or ‘the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization’ and share proof of this organizational status.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Doğruluk Payı is a project of the Izlemedeyiz Association, which was founded in 2014 and is officially registered as an NGO in Turkey. The activities of the Doğruluk Payı project are conducted under the umbrella of the association. The Doğruluk Payı brand is owned by Medusa Dijital Yayıncılık A.Ş., but the rights to its use are held by the İzlemedeyiz Derneği and İzlemedeyiz Derneği İktisadi İşletmesi.
The 'Hakkımızda (About Us)' section on the main page of the Doğruluk Payı website provides details about the project's development process and its organizational structure.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
There is a statement on their website indicates their revenue sources. Despite not being very detailed, it is easy to assume that those grants constitute much more than 5% of their income.
done_all 4.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 4.2
Proof you meet criteria
If your organization is an “independent organization”, please share a link to the page on your website where you detail your funding and indicate the legal form in which the organization is registered (e.g. as a non-profit, as a company etc).
If your organization is “the fact-checking section or unit of a media house or other parent organization”, please share a link to the statement on your website about your ownership.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Doğruluk Payı is a project of the Izlemedeyiz Association, which was founded in 2014 and is officially registered as an NGO in Turkey. The activities of the Doğruluk Payı project are conducted under the umbrella of the association. The Doğruluk Payı brand is owned by Medusa Dijital Yayıncılık A.Ş., but the rights to its use are held by the İzlemedeyiz Derneği and İzlemedeyiz Derneği İktisadi İşletmesi.
The 'Hakkımızda (About Us)' section on the main page of the Doğruluk Payı website provides details about the project's development process and its organizational structure.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Their about section, narrative, and documents provided above are in line with their statement.
done_all 4.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 4.3
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you set out your organizational structure, making clear how and by whom editorial control is exercised.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Doğruluk Payı is a project of the Izlemedeyiz Association, which was founded in 2014 and is officially registered as an NGO in Turkey. The activities of the Doğruluk Payı project are conducted under the umbrella of the association. The Doğruluk Payı brand is owned by Medusa Dijital Yayıncılık A.Ş., but the rights to its use are held by the İzlemedeyiz Derneği and İzlemedeyiz Derneği İktisadi İşletmesi.
The 'Hakkımızda (About Us)' section on the main page of the Doğruluk Payı website provides details about the project's development process and its organizational structure.
https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/sayfa/hakkimizda
You can find organizational structure and key personnel:
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Their team page is publicly visible and their about page also gives a background information about organizationa lstructure.
done_all 4.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 4.4
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you set out the professional biographies of those who play a significant part in your organization’s editorial output.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
All our key actors, including our executive and editors, along with their respective biographies, can be found on this page of our website.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Their team page includes links to bios of all editors and relevant staff.
done_all 4.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 4.5
Proof you meet criteria
Please share a link to where on your website you encourage users to communicate with your editorial team.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Our followers can easily get in touch with us through email, WhatsApp our social media accounts.
You can find all our institutional contact details at https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/sayfa/hakkimizda
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
They provide easy means on their website as required by the criterion.
done_all 4.5 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 5: A commitment to Standards and Transparency of Methodology
To be compliant on methodology, applicants must meet these six criteria
- 5.1 The applicant publishes on its website a statement about the methodology it uses to select, research, write and publish its fact checks.
- 5.2 The applicant selects claims to check based primarily on the reach and importance of the claims, and where possible explains the reason for choosing the claim to check.
- 5.3 The applicant sets out in its fact checks relevant evidence that appears to support the claim as well as relevant evidence that appears to undermine it.
- 5.4 The applicant in its fact checks assesses the merits of the evidence found using the same high standards applied to evidence on equivalent claims, regardless of who made the claim.
- 5.5 The applicant seeks where possible to contact those who made the claim to seek supporting evidence, noting that (I) this is often not possible with online claims, (II) if the person who makes the claim fails to reply in a timely way this should not impede the fact check, (III) if a speaker adds caveats to the claim, the fact-checker should be free to continue with checking the original claim, (IV) fact-checkers may not wish to contact the person who made the claim for safety or other legitimate reasons.
- 5.6 The applicant encourages users to send in claims to check, while making it clear what readers can legitimately expect will be fact-checked and what isn’t fact-checkable.
Criteria 5.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a link to the statement on your website that explains the methodology you use to select, research, write and publish your fact checks.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
You can find methodology page: https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/sayfa/metodoloji
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
I can confirm that Doğruluk Payı transparently publishes a detailed statement on its website, elucidating the methodology they employ for the selection, research, composition, and dissemination of their fact checks. This methodology is not only thorough but is also presented in a manner that is easily comprehensible, ensuring that the audience can grasp and appreciate the rigorous processes behind their fact-checking endeavors.
The clarity and depth of this statement are indeed satisfactory and reflect the organization's commitment to transparency and public understanding.
done_all 5.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğruluk Payı adopts a discerning approach to fact-checking by primarily selecting claims based on their reach and significance. Moreover, whenever feasible, they elucidate the rationale behind their choice to investigate a particular claim. Within the highly polarized landscape of Turkey, and even in the presence of other fact-checking entities, Doğruluk Payı has exhibited commendable performance. Their approach is not only meticulous but also courageous, standing as a beacon of truth and integrity in challenging circumstances.
done_all 5.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.3
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
I can confirm that in their fact-checking endeavors, Doğruluk Payı meticulously presents both relevant evidence that appears to bolster the claim in question as well as evidence that seems to counter or undermine it. This balanced approach ensures a comprehensive evaluation of the claim from all angles. Based on the sample I observed, there hasn't been any instance that contradicts this practice, highlighting Doğruluk Payı's unwavering commitment to thorough and objective fact-checking.
done_all 5.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.4
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğruluk Payı consistently upholds stringent standards in its fact-checking methodology. Regardless of the origin or the proponent of a claim, they ensure that every piece of evidence is scrutinized with the same level of rigor and impartiality. This uniformity in assessment highlights their dedication to maintaining neutrality and fairness in all their evaluations.
done_all 5.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.5
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the methodology used in a randomised sample of your fact checks to assess compliance with these criteria. No additional evidence is required.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
I can affirmatively state that Doğruluk Payı, in its diligent fact-checking process, strives to contact the individuals or entities who have made specific claims to gather supporting evidence. However, challenges arise, especially with online claims where direct communication is often not an option. Furthermore, the absence of a timely response from the claimant should not deter the continuation of the fact-checking process. There are also instances where, even if a speaker introduces caveats to their original statement, fact-checkers maintain the prerogative to verify the primary claim. It's also worth noting that for safety concerns or other legitimate reasons, fact-checkers may consciously choose not to reach out to the claimant. In a media and political environment as intricate as Turkey's, this balanced and cautious approach is paramount to ensure both the accuracy and the security of the fact-checking procedure.
done_all 5.5 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 5.6
Proof you meet criteria
Please describe how you encourage users to send in claims to check, while making it clear what readers can legitimately expect will be fact-checked and what isn’t fact-checkable. Include links where appropriate. If you do not allow this, explain why.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
"Doğruluk Payı features a 'Submit Claim' section on its main page, allowing followers to report suspicious online posts they come across. Furthermore, we regularly use the X platform to encourage our followers to report any suspicious news they encounter."
https://www.dogrulukpayi.com/supheli-iddia-ilet
https://twitter.com/dogrulukpayicom/status/1622579544585535489
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
I can confirm that Doğruluk Payı prominently features a 'Submit Claim' section on its main webpage, facilitating its followers to report any dubious online posts they stumble upon. Furthermore, Doğruluk Payı's active engagement on the X platform is not only commendable but also highly relevant. Given Turkey's news sphere's significant reliance on X, their accessibility and activity on this platform become even more crucial. This strategic presence ensures that they remain at the forefront of addressing misinformation where it is most prevalent, reflecting a proactive approach in the ever-evolving media landscape of Turkey.
done_all 5.6 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Section 6: A commitment to an Open & Honest Corrections Policy
To be compliant on corrections policy, applicants must meet these five criteria
- 6.1 The applicant has a corrections or complaints policy that is easily visible and accessible on the organization’s website or frequently referenced in broadcasts.
- 6.2 The policy sets out clear definitions of what it does and does not cover, how major mistakes, especially those requiring revised conclusions of a fact check, are handled, and the fact that some complaints may justify no response. This policy is adhered to scrupulously.
- 6.3 Where credible evidence is provided that the applicant has made a mistake worthy of correction, the applicant makes a correction openly and transparently, seeking as far as possible to ensure that users of the original see the correction and the corrected version.
- 6.4 The applicant, if an existing signatory, should either on its corrections/complaints page or on the page where it declares itself an IFCN signatory inform users that if they believe the signatory is violating the IFCN Code, they may inform the IFCN, with a link to the IFCN site.
- 6.5 If the applicant is the fact-checking unit of a media company, it is a requirement of signatory status that the parent media company has and adheres to an open and honest corrections policy.
Criteria 6.1
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a link to where you publish on your website your corrections or complaints policy. If you are primarily a broadcaster, please provide evidence you frequently reference your corrections policy in broadcasts.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
You can locate the principles that guide objections and corrections for Doğruluk Payı on the website's methodology page.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
I can confirm that Doğruluk Payı has instituted a corrections or complaints policy which is not only prominently displayed but is also easily accessible on the organization's official website. Additionally, this policy is frequently referenced in their contents, ensuring that their audience is well-informed and aware of the avenues available for addressing any concerns or discrepancies. This transparency underscores Doğruluk Payı's commitment to accountability and continuous improvement.
done_all 6.1 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 6.2
Proof you meet criteria
The assessor will review the corrections policy to verify it meets critera. No additional information needed.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Doğruluk Payı operates in strict alignment with the criteria mentioned.
Their policy meticulously delineates clear definitions of its scope, specifying what it encompasses and what it excludes. Furthermore, the policy outlines the procedures for addressing major inaccuracies, especially those that necessitate revised conclusions in a fact check.
It also acknowledges that certain complaints might not warrant a response. Throughout my observations, it is evident that Doğruluk Payı adheres to this policy with unwavering rigor and consistency, ensuring that their fact-checking practices remain transparent, accountable, and of the highest standard.
done_all 6.2 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 6.3
Proof you meet criteria
Please provide a short statement about how the policy was adhered to over the previous year (or six months if this is the first application) including evidence of two examples of the responses provided by the applicant to a correction request over the previous year. Where no correction request has been made in the previous year, you must state this in your application, which will be publicly available in the assessment if your application is successful.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Over the past year, Doğruluk Payı has been accepting objections and correction applications through various channels, including social media, email, and the Meta Fact-checking product. Up to this point, there have been no changes in the ratings of our published content. Rating updates have been limited to the content tagged on Facebook and Instagram.
It's worth noting that a substantial majority of the objections we receive do not come with counter-evidence. In the annex, you can find two responses that Doğruluk Payı typically employs to address objections. These responses serve as general templates that we use to address objections.
Correction mail 2.pn... (131 KB)
Correction mail 1.pn... (141 KB)
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
Having thoroughly examined the document provided in the annex, I can confirm that Doğruluk Payı's decision to refrain from making changes in the ratings of their published content was justified. Upon my review, it is evident that their ratings align appropriately with the evidence and methodology presented, underscoring the accuracy and prudence of their original assessments.
done_all 6.3 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 6.4
Proof you meet criteria
If you are an existing signatory, please provide a link to show where on your site you inform users that if they believe you are violating the IFCN Code, they may inform the IFCN of this, with a link to the complaints page on the IFCN site.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Followers of Doğruluk Payı who believe that the organization has violated IFCN principles can submit their complaints directly to IFCN via the methodology page on the website.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
There is no problem about this criterion.
done_all 6.4 marked as Compliant by Sarphan Uzunoğlu.
Criteria 6.5
Proof you meet criteria
If you are the fact-checking unit of a media company, please provide a link to the parent media company’s honest and open corrections policy and provide evidence that it adheres to this.
Doğruluk Payı
30-Aug-2023 (1 year ago) Updated: 1 year ago
Doğruluk Payı is a project of the Izlemedeyiz Association, which was founded in 2014 and is officially registered as an NGO in Turkey.
Sarphan Uzunoğlu Assessor
25-Oct-2023 (11 months ago) Updated: 11 months ago
They have a relevant statement publicly available.